So what is benefit for full frame vs. cost vs apsc
For me, I can only think of the following feature that ff brings
- better dof
-- never shot razor narrow dof, but u now have speedbooster adapter
- ff lens focal length - a 50 is a 50
-- used to be on my big list, but over the years this one is not as important any longer.. But again speedbooster. But this solution currently for slr lenses only
-- native Fuji or Nex ff lenses are going to be additional expense
- better dynamic range
- better high iso
-- I am happy w/ good iso up to 3200 which Fuji has been able to provide
Given that the possible higher cost of just the body (Sony rumor site saying it could be between 3-4k for the body) plus re-investment for new lenses, I don't c that there will be a lot of people who would go this route IMHO.. But if the price is below 2k for the body, then I can c more people going ff... I would be tempt myself..
Only time will tell...
Gary