secksthoi
Established
I should also add that I know that the photographer and the glass makes the most difference, which I have not ruled out the Zeiss 35mm Biogon f/2! Those make BEAUTIFUL images.. (envy)
Hey secksthoi, (... heh) I hope you eventually get your MP.
Once I have saved enough, how do I go about buying this camera?
Just because it can be bought new, the MP is not Leica's film "flagship".
M3 and M6 are the most successful Ms, in terms of production numbers and use - by a far margin.
Plus 1 for resisting the urge.
Agreed, save your money and get an M6.
...the in-camera meter is very annoying, especially in low light situations when you get a red haze with which to contend 😉 A good M3/2/4 runs as smooth or smoother than a MP in my experience.....
A used M6 will do nicely. The build quality of the MP is at best marginally ....
Any Wetzlar M body prior to the M4-2 has a better build quality, just ask knowledgeble repair people like DAG or Sherry Krauter.
When the MP came out back in '03 there was a lot of chatter and specifications about how the MP was much more robust then the M6. I forget the particulars, but people were pointing to specifics. And although I love Sherry and respect DAG, I doubt either has worked on more then a handful of MPs.
The fact is that either an MP or M6 will likely last a lifetime. They are both solidly built, as are most m cameras. I've probably put 700-1000 rolls in my MP since '03 and it's just humming along fine. No problems.
The recently acquired M4 I have (with a new CLA) is no more smooth; in fact, I feel the MP is more smooth -- but that means nothing.