venchka
Veteran
...it came to 5,665usd..... 🙄
😱
Or..................
Spread that money over 1 camera, 2-3 lenses, film, and travel expenses.
Your photography will be greatly enhanced by the second plan.
Last edited:
...it came to 5,665usd..... 🙄
have you used Ms before? have you had the chance to compare the MP to other models? if you're that short on money, you might find that the MP really doesn't offer you much more (nothing, if you ask me, but I agree that it looks good) than most other Ms especially with regards to the big extra you'll be paying. remember you need a good lens to make the camera worthwhile at all and those don't come cheap either.
What takes the actual picture is the lens!
Just because it can be bought new, the MP is not Leica's film "flagship".
M3 and M6 are the most successful Ms, in terms of production numbers and use - by a far margin.
Just depends how you look at it 🙂
No idea about your finances. But as a rule of thumb, I suggest to only buy a camera if you can easily replace it when it breaks or is lost. Ideally use two, so (a) you can shoot with two, (b) you have a replacement when the camera needs service.
Just my 2 cents.
From http://www.merriam-webster.com, flag·ship: the finest, largest, or most important one of a series ...
Whatever. Keep calling the MP like that and the OP will order one tomorrow.
From http://www.merriam-webster.com, flag·ship: the finest, largest, or most important one of a series ...
Whatever. Keep calling the MP like that and the OP will order one tomorrow.
This backs up part of Venchka's argument for the M5! 😀