Uncommon, Rare, and Collector's Delights.

Hope everyone's out shooting w/their rare, uncommon, &/or collectible gear. Where are my Ektra people at?

View attachment 4785943




KodakEktar01.jpg

KodakEktar02.jpg

Since last week, I'm part of the Ektra-crowd!
1941 sample with 1940 Ektar 50/1.9.
Appears to have new shutter curtains. And it works!
Testing it with some Kentmere 100 at the moment.
 
I also have the M39 mount version of this lens, I believe designed for Paxette. I have never used it but always thought about one day trying to have it converted to LTM. I would assume the same optical formula but just a different mount?

You will need an M39 extension ring to put an M39 Paxette lens on an LTM mount camera. Since there's no rangefinder coupling you will have to use zone focus or an external rangefinder to set the distance manually. I bought an extension ring off ebay, and it works fine. I believe the extension is 15.2mm, but better check it if you plan to make your own.
 
View attachment 4844634

View attachment 4844635

Since last week, I'm part of the Ektra-crowd!
1941 sample with 1940 Ektar 50/1.9.
Appears to have new shutter curtains. And it works!
Testing it with some Kentmere 100 at the moment.

That looks like Grandpa's. I thought the name was Ektar but I see it was Ektra. And I guess the 47mm did not come on it, or did it?
 
That looks like Grandpa's. I thought the name was Ektar but I see it was Ektra. And I guess the 47mm did not come on it, or did it?

Kodak made 6 lenses for the Ektra, all "Ektar"-quality lenses. A 35mm, 2x 50mm, 90, 135 and a 153mm. Though a couple of others had been planned but were never made (85mm and 254mm IIRC). The 47mm f/2 Ektar was mounted on some Kodak Retinas, the Kodak Bantam Special and the Premier Instruments' Kardon camera as far as I know.
 
Kodak made 6 lenses for the Ektra, all "Ektar"-quality lenses. A 35mm, 2x 50mm, 90, 135 and a 153mm. Though a couple of others had been planned but were never made (85mm and 254mm IIRC). The 47mm f/2 Ektar was mounted on some Kodak Retinas, the Kodak Bantam Special and the Premier Instruments' Kardon camera as far as I know.

It is, of course, the Kardon one that would pique my interest. But after I lie down and calm down I realize that I have a lot of nice 50's already. I need to get out more and use the gear rather than buy more. And I am fine with the retro lenses I already have, but . . . ;o)
 
It is, of course, the Kardon one that would pique my interest. But after I lie down and calm down I realize that I have a lot of nice 50's already. I need to get out more and use the gear rather than buy more. And I am fine with the retro lenses I already have, but . . . ;o)

I've shot 2 rolls with my Kardon + Ektar since June. It's alright, though a little prone to over-exposure in the center of the image from stray light. It definitely needs a hood.

TPcaseKardon.jpg


The lens separately sells for almost as much as the lens+body combo. 😳
 
I've shot 2 rolls with my Kardon + Ektar since June. It's alright, though a little prone to over-exposure in the center of the image from stray light. It definitely needs a hood.

TPcaseKardon.jpg


The lens separately sells for almost as much as the lens+body combo. 😳

The lens is tempting, lenses always are. But I do not need a film body. I left film 25 years ago. That does look like a nice combo and the Kardon is an interesting camera. From what I read it is mechanically better than Leica.
 
It feels like it is the best version of the Leica IIIa I've ever handled. Peter Kardon reverse-engineered it to much tighter tolerances than Leica ever did. Of course the US government left the Premium Instruments Corp. hanging .....twice.
 
It feels like it is the best version of the Leica IIIa I've ever handled. Peter Kardon reverse-engineered it to much tighter tolerances than Leica ever did. Of course the US government left the Premium Instruments Corp. hanging .....twice.

It is a very interesting camera. A startup that got horsed around by suppliers, other businesses and the government came up with their version of Leica that was better than the actual Leica. I'd say that was pretty impressive. The government backed away because the war was over and the need had evaporated. They did not want a warehouse full of unused cameras. I do not know the details of the contracts so I cannot make any real valid comment on the right or wrong of the deal.

It would be fun to have. But I am not masochistic enough to get involved with film again in any form or fashion. It is just too difficult and demanding. That does not diminish the interest of the camera. But paying US$1,000+ for a paperweight is not for me.

This link is killing me: Leica Camera Copy Kardon 415 Civilian Model w/ Case & Instructions | Very Rare | eBay
 
Yikes, that's asking quite a bit for civilian version, with a "I have not tested it" for good measure. 🙄
Same as the Ebay seller that was asking 6000 for a Simmon Brothers Combat Camera recently....that's more than 10x of what I paid for mine.

Another uncommon one from the collection (that deserves a better glamour photo):

Suprema.jpg

Kodak Suprema (1800 units)
 
Yikes, that's asking quite a bit for civilian version, with a "I have not tested it" for good measure. 🙄
Same as the Ebay seller that was asking 6000 for a Simmon Brothers Combat Camera recently....that's more than 10x of what I paid for mine.

Another uncommon one from the collection (that deserves a better glamour photo):

Suprema.jpg

Kodak Suprema (1800 units)

You have some collection. I am always keen on Kodak from the family connection with Rochester.

About the Kardon, "Seller accepts no returns" which to me means the damned thing is a pretty dog. Guaranteed to be a heart breaker. As I have said other places, I shop for a long time on eBay. That Amotal took three or four months before I felt I had found the one I wanted. Haste is unwise on eBay. And read the write-up, all of it, two or thee times.
 
The Suprema came from the same collector/dealer as this Bolsey B "PH-324A", that replaced the Kodak 35 "PH-324" in use by the US army in the late 1940s.

Again, it deserves a better glamour shot.....
VC2_007.jpg

I remember civilian Bolseys. They were around when I had the Vito II. That was a long time ago.
 
I suppose they didn't garner much traction with the collectors, but now the super-wide angle crowd seems to have started to show some interest in them.
Also, it's made in Canada 🙂
 
Yikes, that's asking quite a bit for civilian version, with a "I have not tested it" for good measure. 🙄
Same as the Ebay seller that was asking 6000 for a Simmon Brothers Combat Camera recently....that's more than 10x of what I paid for mine.

Another uncommon one from the collection (that deserves a better glamour photo):

Suprema.jpg

Kodak Suprema (1800 units)
Is that a tax stamp ("Douane") hanging off the strap?
 
Not so much a camera but photography related collectors item.....

A "Darkroom-in-a-box" , US Army Signal Corps Photographic Set PH-261
Took me nearly 2 years to get it rebuilt from an empty case. Had to source everything separately or rebuild it from scratch, like the electrical control unit.
It's only missing a few small pieces now. .

PH-261_20231220.jpg


Copylights04.jpg


Ready for action.
 
Back
Top Bottom