Interesting.... Black coffee and a "milky" lens 😁
Blue skies and smiles!
It is a black SR-1, one of those cameras that they are very rare to find - the second rarest Minolta after a black SR-2. It came out in small production numbers (smaller than that of the SR-2) in three versions with minor changes (mine is the Mark-2 with the shutter speed numbers being evenly distributed on the shutter speed dial). Unfortunately, despite its rarety, it doesn't really worth much online (monetary speaking).Gosh, it has been ages since I've seen a Minolta SR-3.
In the good old days now long past I had an SRT-101. I bought it 1974 in Sydney from a Swedish friend who had picked it up duty free in Stockholm. I recall I paid AUD $150 for it. Dragged it all over Asia with online lens, the 50 1.4. Later on I acquired an adapter to use Pentax Takumars and Hanimex bottle bottom glass lenses on it, but I found the images the latter lenses made weren't really up to the rendering of the Rokkor.
I sold many photos taken with that 101. It lasted til' the mid-1980s when I traded in a lot of gear to fund a Leica M2.
Both cameras I still wish I had kept.
a very nice lens...and camera
a very nice lens...and camera
![]()
Minolta Rokkor 58mm f/1.4: a lens with personality
I have always appreciated vintage lenses, especially those with personality-not necessarily the sharpest or most correct, but the most distinguishable. The Minolta Rokkor 58/1.4 lens is certa…justknocking.wordpress.com
Hmm...The Achromatic Coating was two layers of coating, a decided advantage over the single layer of most of the competition until multi-coating emerged upon the scene.
Hmm...
When I took this lens apart to clean the aperture mechanism from oil, I noticed that the inner group (facing the aperture blades) had different colour coating than the front elements. Is that what you mean?
View attachment 4872146
Minolta pioneered its "Achromatic coating" which was two layers of magnesium fluoride deposited in different thicknesses. I do not have evidence if this means two Layers of different thicknesses on only one glass or two different layers on two different glasses.My understanding was that it was two layers of coating on each glass surface. It's possible that they used different coatings on different elements.
In the case of Minolta's later multi-coated lenses (MD, at least), they didn't apply the same coatings to every lens surface. Rather, they used different coating formulations on different lens elements to maintain consistent color and contrast throughout the lens line, thus compensating for different color/contrast characteristics among different lens designs. I know that Zeiss, and possibly most other brands, applied identical coatings to every lens surface.
Another interesting fact. As far as I know, Minolta and Nikon were the only Japanese camera brands to make their own optical glass.
- Murray