Ororaro
Well-known
That makes it a native ltm, amigo…
And then there is the legendarino 21 f3.4 M
Agreed... the perfect occasion for the 8x20 banquet camera!Personally I think Leonardo would have been more a large format type of guy. 🙂
Interesting. I have only tried/own the CV so perhaps that's why I am so underwhelmed by the focal length but I really like 28 so there is also that. I tend to a 28/50/90 troika in Leica focal lengths.I don't know if I responded on the lens question, but here are some quick notes, since I have a ton of 21mm lenses:
Avenon/Kobalux 21mm - extremely sharp, very little vignetting, very low corner blur on digital (b/c slightly retrofocus). Compact front to back.
CV Skopar 21/4 LTM - least favorite 21mm
Konica 21/35 Dual Hexanon - I've now been on two trips with this, and there is no better travel lens. Also good on digital.
Leica 21mm Super Elmar - this is the best one for digital, bar none. Heavy.
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 - for $400, you're not going to get a better or faster lens. No way the Leica version is 20x better for 20x the price.
Zeiss ZM Biogon 4.5 - bar none, the best film-oriented 21mm ever made. Tiny, ultra-sharp, undistorted. Not easy on color digital but doable.
In "21mm" lenses, I would also look hard at the 18mm ZM Distagon. It is an insanely good lens, and though it is not light, it has superb across the frame performance.
Interesting. I have only tried/own the CV so perhaps that's why I am so underwhelmed by the focal length but I really like 28 so there is also that. I tend to a 28/50/90 troika in Leica focal lengths.
That said, my current and favorite 28 is the Kobalux so perhaps finding one of their 21's might not be a bad idea ... Hmm...
Having owned a lot of 20/21mm lenses this is my 'reference' lens by which others are judged. None have come close (within its operating envelope).Leica 21mm Super Elmar - this is the best one for digital, bar none. Heavy.
The distortion is a little weird, but it's definitely low drama.Having owned a lot of 20/21mm lenses this is my 'reference' lens by which others are judged. None have come close (within its operating envelope).
No, uh, affiliation with the seller (I scored a black one, so I didn't need two). I am also teeing up to sell my ZM 4.5 and TT1.5.
Avenon (Kobalux) 21mm f/2.8 w Finder + M Adapter
Nice set consisting of an Avenon 21mm lens, chrome with original 21mm chrome Avenon bright line finder, front cap, hood, Avenon M adapter (actually mawww.rangefinderforum.com
None of this is fast moving; no worries. I keep telling myself I have to slim down the ranks of the 21s, but any other task seems more interesting by comparison. 🙂You tempt me badly sir 🙂 Too bad I have too many irons in the fire right now 🙁 Knowing my 28 I do think I'd be more inclined to like this 21 but unfortunately I'd have to ask you to wait a month and I won't do that for something like this. Now, if you haven't sold this beauty come 9/13, let me know 😎 because the toy fund will replenish by then and I'll be able to indulge in temptation.
👍None of this is fast moving; no worries. I keep telling myself I have to slim down the ranks of the 21s, but any other task seems more interesting by comparison. 🙂
I don't know if I responded on the lens question, but here are some quick notes, since I have a ton of 21mm lenses:
Avenon/Kobalux 21mm - extremely sharp, very little vignetting, very low corner blur on digital (b/c slightly retrofocus). Compact front to back.
CV Skopar 21/4 LTM - least favorite 21mm
Konica 21/35 Dual Hexanon - I've now been on two trips with this, and there is no better travel lens. Also good on digital.
Leica 21mm Super Elmar - this is the best one for digital, bar none. Heavy.
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 - for $400, you're not going to get a better or faster lens. No way the Leica version is 20x better for 20x the price.
Zeiss ZM Biogon 4.5 - bar none, the best film-oriented 21mm ever made. Tiny, ultra-sharp, undistorted. Not easy on color digital but doable.
In "21mm" lenses, I would also look hard at the 18mm ZM Distagon. It is an insanely good lens, and though it is not light, it has superb across the frame performance.
I also use one just on film.... the Color Skopar 21mm f4 has gotten lots of good reviews over the years.Could you say a bit more about your objections to the Voightlander Color Skopar 21mm f/4? I have one of these in LTM with an adapter ring and use it both with a IIIf body and Ms and I have been very impressed with its correction, sharpness, and contrast. However, I only shoot monochrome film so its shortcoming when pixel peeping will be nonobvious to me.
Oops! Now I see it!I ended up with an LTM version of the Skopar 21mm f/4 that I can use on both my IIIf and M bodies. I also bought the TT Artisan finder.
Thanks to everyone who responded.
I tested it when the world was "film only" after a claim by a rather prominent CV pusher that it was great. The CV was light, small, and cheaper (by about 15% than the Avenon/Kobalux that was the only other non-Super Angulon in town) - but past that, the performance (esp corners at wide apertures) was not exactly mind-blowing, the ergonomics were very so-so (joystick?!), and the manufacturing looked crude early on (the copy I bought new had an RF cam that clearly had been hand-filed and painted to make "infinity"). Since it came out, a lot of better 21s have emerged. None cheaper or cuter, but still...I also use one just on film.... the Color Skopar 21mm f4 has gotten lots of good reviews over the years.
Likewise not a pixel peeper so not affected by digital shortcomings....