raid
Dad Photographer
Are there SA 21mm versions that can harm a sensor ? I see online SA lenses that look different from each other.
Raid, you might get more answers if you start a dedicated thread...... since the title of this one is "21 mm for Film Leica M"Are there SA 21mm versions that can harm a sensor ? I see online SA lenses that look different from each other.
You are correct re:Well, I stand corrected!
But I know I'm right about the M5 and CL - the rear of the lens will interfere with the metering arm.
Helen: Can you also confirm the M6 meter doesn't work with the 21mm SA?
The meter of the M6 has a sensor mounted in the housing that reads off of the dot on the shutter curtain. I seem to recall reading the rear of the SA blocks the sensor, but I guess that may be incorrect too.... I have used her on the M6 - no issues , different type of meter
Raid actually asked a # of questions about use on digital... like the comparison of the SA 3.4 with the 4....as well as the "sensor harm" questionDedicated thread? - Look here.
Apparently, use on digital does come with some compromises.
boring OUR MAN ken ...🙄Ken Rockwell said this: The LEICA SUPER-ELMAR-M 21mm f/3.4 ASPH is LEICA's best ultrawide lens ever made at any price. It is ultrasharp at every aperture, has negligible distortion, is small, light and takes common 46mm filters, and for the first time since 1958's SUPER-ANGULON 21mm f/4, has a proper 9-bladed diaphragm for superior 18-pointed sunstars
That too, HH.b alh, boring OUR MAN ken ...🙄
Raid since this thread is about 21mm for film...... how does the Hologon (albeit 16mm) work for that?With film cameras I have several excellent options for very wide angle lenses. The Hologon is OK with B&W digital.
1. Hasselblad SWC
2. Zeiss Hologon in M mount 16mm/8
3. Canon 19mm ltm
4. Minolta Rokkor 21mm 4
5. Nikkor 20mm/4 (for the Nikon F2)
I am not a fan of Ken Rockwell. Sorry about mentioning him here.I don't mean disrespect
re: Mr Rockwell
it's just aside from his vast Encyclopedic
knowledge he has thrown together from various sources
His photography has
NO Heart or Soul
hence I find my info
from 'othets'
It's all good Raid...In the several months since chuckroast started this thread. He's chosen and bought one. But to go back to the assessment of the latest Leica M 21mm..... the latest & sharpest lens may not be the choice for all of our photography. In LF I used to have a few of the "best" ...90mm Super Angulon XL, & Rodenstock Apo-Sironar S.... I tired of their clinical perfection & ended up with a few Goerz Dagors and Commercial Ektars. I still like prefer my Rolleiflex w the Tessar (even especially in 20x24" enlargments).... & the older Leica LTM lenses are hard to beat.... & circle back... the 21mm Super-Angulon 3.4 has lots of admirers....I take it all back 🙂
Forgive me.