Lucian010
I shoot, Therefore I am..
here i am, a 21mm junkie... yes, the 21mm color skopar is my "only" lens! wanted to hear and see some shots of fellow 21mm shooters here.
i will start the ball rolling!
i will start the ball rolling!

Lucian010
I shoot, Therefore I am..
kingqueenknave
Well-known

Portland, OR by kingqueenknave, on Flickr

Portland, OR by kingqueenknave, on Flickr

Portland, OR by kingqueenknave, on Flickr
Lss
Well-known
ntruj
Established

360 Bridge by ntruj, on Flickr
My CV 21/4 on an M2.
I really like this lens. I have a few more rolls to develop and scan that hopefully will have a keeper or two on them.
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
I seem to have a Love/Hate relationship with the 21
don't really shoot 21 anymore but I Certainly had Fun with it ....
One Day ...soooon... will go back to it

Life is filled with Broken hearts...Broken shells by helenhill_HH, on Flickr
don't really shoot 21 anymore but I Certainly had Fun with it ....
One Day ...soooon... will go back to it

Life is filled with Broken hearts...Broken shells by helenhill_HH, on Flickr
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Avotius
Some guy
Zeiss 21mm f2.8 Biogon ZM. I dont have anymore M mount cameras but I kept this lens because I love it.
On Leica M6 with either Fuji Superia or TRI-X
On Leica M6 with either Fuji Superia or TRI-X






helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
Just plain stinkin jaw dropping GORGEOUS Avotius...
!
ntruj
Established
Just plain stinkin jaw dropping GORGEOUS Avotius...!
That about sums it up!
Avotius
Some guy
Just plain stinkin jaw dropping GORGEOUS Avotius...!
Thanks! What I love most about this and other good Zeiss lenses is how underexposed areas tend to shift into a blue color. Its beautiful. After using this lens I look down upon my Canon 17-40 with disappointment. I really want a Sony RX1 because it has that great Zeiss lens characteristic....but that price!!!!!
Film dino
David Chong
Charles S
Established
Palace in Seville
Alhambra

Alhambra


Brian Legge
Veteran
Ryan Karr
Newbie
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

I have been addicted to 21's since I got my first SA 21f3.4 in 1964! Always have at least one or two of that focal length - or more!
Death Valley, TriX, SA 21f3.4, red filter, M2.
Last edited:
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

The Death Valley shot was done with a oldie (black SA from early 70's) - this is with the latest addition to my 21 arsenal (which is growing - I think there are 7 or 8 of them now). This is the Voigtlander Ultron 21mm f1.8. Tokyo - and an empty street!
Arista Premium 400, Rodinal 1:60, II min. Bessa R4M and the Ultron 21f1.8
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
A couple of my favorites. Shot with the CV 21mm. Probably on my Bessa R but, possibly, on a Zorki 3m...
These two are relatively old and I am continuing to use the lens but don't have anything else on line that I know is from the 21.
These two are relatively old and I am continuing to use the lens but don't have anything else on line that I know is from the 21.


wilonstott
Wil O.

I shot this with 21mm skopar and Portra 400VC, and converted to Black and White in Aperture.
I think the 21mm focal length works really well when single point perspective is used, because then the distortion is kept at a minimal ,and the lines stay really clean.
I've been watching a lot of Stanley Kubrick films lately, and he uses quite a few single point perspective shots, and I think he does this so he can use extremely wide angle lenses (sometimes as wide as 18mm) without the obvious visual cues that wides give off--namely the overt perception of spacial distortion (straight lines appearing curved).
The trick, I think, is to keep the lens plane level with the viewing plane (don't tilt up or down), and and have the leading lines end at a single point in the distance (like railroad tracks).
Obviously this is only one way to use wide angles, but I'm trying to be more conscious of it because the effect plays with your sense of space and perspective.
In reference to my shot, the only things that give away the use of an extremely wide angle are the articles on the table in the lower left of the image (they are distorted). If they weren't there, then the perspective in the shot would look odd, but it would be harder to pin down exactly why (with a cursory glance, or course).
Anyway, just something I've been thinking about recently.
Good thread. I like this focal length. I need to use it more.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.