back alley
IMAGES
...would make a nice combination...no?
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
Both of these lenses are super nice. But I wouldn't be able to do without the 18 as well.. there are just too many situations that call for something wider than the 27 (40mm equiv.). And just to remind you, Joe... some of your best images here are made with wide angle lenses!
back alley
IMAGES
Both of these lenses are super nice. But I wouldn't be able to do without the 18 as well.. there are just too many situations that call for something wider than the 27 (40mm equiv.). And just to remind you, Joe... some of your best images here are made with wide angle lenses!
you beat me! i was just going to say that the 18 needs to be in there as well.
i just loaded my little domke with those 3 lenses and that will be my carry kit for a bit.
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
back alley
IMAGES
Perfect... unless you want to replace them all with that lovely 18-55!
oh great...another possibility!
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
Yes... Fuji is trying to drive us mad!!
back alley
IMAGES
if i could find a cheaper 18-55 or even a 16-50 i might give it a try.
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
I’ve been very happy with my 23/2 - 50/2 combination (but usually pack the 14/2.8, too.) I have a 27, but for me it’s not as nice of a fit in a multilens system and is usually used alone.
willie_901
Veteran
The 27 is under appreciated because we have to use a thumb wheel for manual aperture settings.
Even though I have the 35/2 I like the 27 and use it often.
Even though I have the 35/2 I like the 27 and use it often.