35mm Summicron ASPH II Flare

brothernature

Established
Local time
1:51 PM
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
148
I've owned one of these for about 4 or 5 years. I've never had issues with flare on it, but recently I've noticed it fairly consistently. When shining a light through the lens, I don't see any scratches or dust on it. I'm not sure how anything would happen to it as it is the only lens ever on my camera and always has a UV filter on it. But does anyone know what might cause this? I put it on a digital body to test it and it seems like it doesn't even need that strong of light to get it to happen. The flare has a consistent shape to it, and as shown in the night shots, even happens from a street lamp coming in at the right angle.
 

Attachments

  • CleanShot 2024-12-15 at 11.05.26@2x.png
    CleanShot 2024-12-15 at 11.05.26@2x.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 23
  • CleanShot 2024-12-15 at 11.12.48@2x.png
    CleanShot 2024-12-15 at 11.12.48@2x.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 21
Are you sure the lens aperture is really working properly? I have a 35mm f2 v1 APSH for 20+ years never have had these issues....
It seems to be working fine. My exposures are accurate and the blades move smoothly.

I don't trust reddit as a source of truth, but here is someone else experiencing it:
 
Check on this thread as well:
 
There are two possibilities - either you just noticed it and are now acutely aware of it, and are looking for it and maybe even provoking it, or some of the internal baffling has fallen off your lens or camera. I honestly doubt that it is the latter. My 50/1.4 ASPH first version makes huge giant flare arcs with the light at the 'right'/'wrong' angle and always has. It just took a lot of photos to find the angle, but then somehow it happened a lot. Grateful for digital and instant review.

Leica M lenses are fantastic, but there are optical compromises, particularly associated with size, and keeping the lenses small and light, when designing lenses that have this much contrast and resolution. Flare is one of them. The Nikkor Z 50mm f1.2 S lens flares less, and resolves more, but the lens alone weighs more than a Leica 50mm f1.4 ASPH and an M camera, and it is about the size of a house brick.

1734326827197.png
 
Beautiful portrait btw Marty!

I shouldn't let it bother me, but it has me considering other 35s.
Thank you, that girl is incredibly photogenic.

I did move away from using the 50/2 Summicron v5 (the last all spherical version with a built-in hood before the APO-ASPH) because of unpredictable veiling glare when using film after a sort of existential doubt crept into my head whenever I used that lens. I have settled on the 50/1.4 ASPH for working digitally, because I can see when the flare is happening. I carry a 20x20 cm piece of foam core with me and use it as an additional hood. I suspect all Leica 35s, even the 35/2 APO ASPH, will do something similar if you use them in this sort of light. The Zeiss ZM 35/2 and 35/2.8 may not, but they have lower contrast and, at least with the 35/2, lower resolution. As I said, nothing is perfect.
 
I also have a 35 1.4 pre ASPH only time I get flare is wide open in extreme lighting situations. So if I want it I know how to get it.. my 35 f2 ASPH V1 might flare a little wide open in extreme lighting. Watch you lighting seems like you are shooting into the sun… this for me is usually a no no… but others like doing it.
 
I also have a 35 1.4 pre ASPH only time I get flare is wide open in extreme lighting situations. So if I want it I know how to get it.. my 35 f2 ASPH V1 might flare a little wide open in extreme lighting. Watch you lighting seems like you are shooting into the sun… this for me is usually a no no… but others like doing it.
Sometimes something interesting is happening in front of the sun 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom