Bullwinkle
J. Moose
mifo2000
Member
Hi Steve,
the 2.5/ 75mm is a nice lens. Last summer I took it for a trip to Italy.
Here are some examples! I used Fujichrome 200. The scans were done with an Epson Perfection 1200 Photo.
Greetings
Michael
the 2.5/ 75mm is a nice lens. Last summer I took it for a trip to Italy.
Here are some examples! I used Fujichrome 200. The scans were done with an Epson Perfection 1200 Photo.
Greetings
Michael
Attachments
Imagestreet
Member
This is a great lens if you want a short telephoto. Very sharp, good colour rendition, pleasing bokeh. I am selling mine as sadly I'm more of a wide angle guy but I was very happy with the results.
On eBay below
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280192167461
On eBay below
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280192167461
steve kessel
steve kessel
What a shame. I bought it new just last Monday. Will post some pictures soon. Good luck with your sale.
Steve
Steve
BillP
Rangefinder General
I love this lens. I use it on my M7, M2 and IIIc, as here.
Regards,
Bill

Regards,
Bill
Last edited:
Quercus
Quercus
Fuji provia scanned and converted in PS - just a very nice lens I find it great for this type of botanical shot
Krosya
Konicaze
Imagestreet said:This is a great lens if you want a short telephoto. Very sharp, good colour rendition, pleasing bokeh. I am selling mine as sadly I'm more of a wide angle guy but I was very happy with the results.
On eBay below
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280192167461
So why didn't you offer it here first? And you also use this forum to promote it on Ebay? Plus you don't ship outside of UK? Hmmm. Why do you feel comfortable to put a link to you ebay auction here than?
Thanks for nothing.
Imagestreet
Member
Err, given that I expressed an opinion that was relevant to the original forum posting I thought that tacking the link on was not a major problem (if this is a problem then I'm happy for it to be deleted). I've seen others do this so didn't think it was a problem.
Point otherwise taken. As a special concession to RFF members - regardless of what it says on the eBay advert I will sell it to overseas RFF members, and if you win it then I'll take off 10% of the winning bid amount as an RFF discount! Is that any better?
Point otherwise taken. As a special concession to RFF members - regardless of what it says on the eBay advert I will sell it to overseas RFF members, and if you win it then I'll take off 10% of the winning bid amount as an RFF discount! Is that any better?
Krosya
Konicaze
Imagestreet said:Err, given that I expressed an opinion that was relevant to the original forum posting I thought that tacking the link on was not a major problem (if this is a problem then I'm happy for it to be deleted). I've seen others do this so didn't think it was a problem.
Point otherwise taken. As a special concession to RFF members - regardless of what it says on the eBay advert I will sell it to overseas RFF members, and if you win it then I'll take off 10% of the winning bid amount as an RFF discount! Is that any better?
Sounds much better this way. At least to me. Thank you for looking into this.
FYI, usually when people refer to ebay ads here - those ads do not belong to the poster, but rather a find of independent ebay post. It's just the etiquette here. But I think your correction/addition makes things good now.
jmilkins
Digited User
there's one image wide open @closest focus distance in my gallery . Oi like it.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=48946
Last edited:
I like the lens too, light and neat, but don't often use a lens this long on an RF. My records show use only on my M2, only with B&W, only two rolls. Here's one with Pan-F on a stroll along an abandoned/former route of a main US highway through a river canyon.
(Now that I finally have a camera body with 75mm framelines - Hexar RF - I may use it more!)
(Now that I finally have a camera body with 75mm framelines - Hexar RF - I may use it more!)
Attachments
Last edited:
steve kessel
steve kessel
Doug said:Here's one with Pan-F on a stroll along an abandoned/former route of a main US highway through a river canyon.
Doug
I like this one a lot. It's also showing me how I could use this lens in ways I hadn't considered.
Best wishes
Steved
rivercrew
Member
Imagestreet said:Err, given that I expressed an opinion that was relevant to the original forum posting I thought that tacking the link on was not a major problem (if this is a problem then I'm happy for it to be deleted). I've seen others do this so didn't think it was a problem.
Point otherwise taken. As a special concession to RFF members - regardless of what it says on the eBay advert I will sell it to overseas RFF members, and if you win it then I'll take off 10% of the winning bid amount as an RFF discount! Is that any better?
I like your offer so I put in a bid.
Roy
Graham Line
Well-known
75-85-90 are nice lengths for picking out the isolated images you are seeing in a larger context. If I wasn't happy with the M-Rokkor 90/4, I'd sure look at the CV.
What is the closest focus of the CV 75?
What is the closest focus of the CV 75?
ferider
Veteran
Joe Brugger: What is the closest focus of the CV 75?
1m, Joe.
1m, Joe.
steve kessel
steve kessel
Graham Line
Well-known
The clarity of CV's 'slow' lenses really impresses me. I have frames on Delta 400 that compare well to 6x6 frames of 30 years ago.
venchka
Veteran
No magic lenses here. Magic users maybe.
Y'all are convincing me to keep my 75/2.5 just when I was about to weaken and sell it. And now I only have one LTM body. The 35mm UC-Hexanon & C/V 75mm would make an awesome pair on a couple LTM bodies. I had that pair. Sold one of the bodies. GRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Y'all are convincing me to keep my 75/2.5 just when I was about to weaken and sell it. And now I only have one LTM body. The 35mm UC-Hexanon & C/V 75mm would make an awesome pair on a couple LTM bodies. I had that pair. Sold one of the bodies. GRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Graham Line
Well-known
"No magic lenses here. Magic users maybe."
Amen to that. For the coming year I'm ignoring any thread with "vs." in the header, and spending the time on the galleries instead.
Amen to that. For the coming year I'm ignoring any thread with "vs." in the header, and spending the time on the galleries instead.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.