furcafe
Veteran
That was probably my fault. I'm not up on my Jupiter numbering, which is why asked whether the Jupiter 8 was "the 85/2, right?" Doing a Google, I see that it's the Jupiter 9 that's the 85/2, so my bad.
From broadie's post, I think you'll be OK w/the 50 as long as you can get right up to the stage. A 50mm can deliver fine results from that distance, e.g., some shots I took last month (though I cropped many of the shots to square, etc.):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe/sets/72057594079291778/
Note these were all on Neopan 1600. My lab uses Xtol, but I've gotten similar results from another lab that uses Ilfotec.
From broadie's post, I think you'll be OK w/the 50 as long as you can get right up to the stage. A 50mm can deliver fine results from that distance, e.g., some shots I took last month (though I cropped many of the shots to square, etc.):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe/sets/72057594079291778/
Note these were all on Neopan 1600. My lab uses Xtol, but I've gotten similar results from another lab that uses Ilfotec.
captainslack said:Not sure where it came across that I had an 85mm lens. I don't, but wish I did. That would be nice to have. Except for the J-12 that's on my Kiev, I've only got 50's. Have to try and change that sometime this year.
Have to try and find a roll of the Neopan 1600. Seems to come widely recommended. Hope it plays will with DDX.