Bergger pancro 400 and DD-X

Based od dev times of such films as APX 400 and RPX 400, and Bergger datasheets Rodinal times I'd suggest DD-X 1+4 12 minutes in 20C.
 
Well; DDX is terrific with Pancro 400! Very impressed with the film, very fine grained and great tone. Recipe I used:
DDX 1+4 9 minutes, agitate first minute then 10 seconds on the top of very minute, Ilfostop 1 minute, Ilford Fixer 6 minutes as per Bergger datasheet, rinse, and wetting agent.

S,

This is the recommended time I was going to try. Glad you got great results.

Interesting to note the recommended time for Tri-X using DDX 1+4 is only 7 minutes. This makes me want to try Panchro 400 at 320 ISO and find out the time for DDX 1+4.

Cal
 
Here's a recipe I used and the results I got, for reference:

Hasselblad 553 ELX, Zeiss Sonnar 4/150mm CF T* lens

~ 1/250, f 11 (I think, I don't remember exactly, but it was a hazy day)

Pancro 400
Developed in Ilford DD-X 1:4
2 min pre-soak
12 min dev @ 20º C

Reference image: https://flic.kr/p/FZZLGq
 
Here's a recipe I used and the results I got, for reference:

Hasselblad 553 ELX, Zeiss Sonnar 4/150mm CF T* lens

~ 1/250, f 11 (I think, I don't remember exactly, but it was a hazy day)

Pancro 400
Developed in Ilford DD-X 1:4
2 min pre-soak
12 min dev @ 20º C

Reference image: https://flic.kr/p/FZZLGq

I found the pre-soak boosts the film speed. If you don't pre-soak I only got about 250 ISO.

The two different layers of emulsion seem to like to be pre-softened to get fill speed. My time for 400 ISO was around 12 minutes also. DDX makes nice negatives.

Cal
 
Here's a recipe I used and the results I got, for reference:

Hasselblad 553 ELX, Zeiss Sonnar 4/150mm CF T* lens

~ 1/250, f 11 (I think, I don't remember exactly, but it was a hazy day)

Pancro 400
Developed in Ilford DD-X 1:4
2 min pre-soak
12 min dev @ 20º C

Reference image: https://flic.kr/p/FZZLGq


I did
9 minutes in DDx 1+4 in my CPE2 at 68 degree.

Untitled by Hogarth Ferguson, on Flickr
 
H,

A JOBO processor requires about 20% less time than doing an inversion tank? Is my thinking correct?

Your image looks like full development to me.

Cal


I think that is true, but I generally don't. I want to say I actually did this at 7:30 because I had just read that you should compensate and I used to do 9:00 minutes. Either way, I was really happy with this roll
 
I think that is true, but I generally don't. I want to say I actually did this at 7:30 because I had just read that you should compensate and I used to do 9:00 minutes. Either way, I was really happy with this roll

H,

I would not argue with your success. You seemed to hit it just right.

Cal
 
Back
Top Bottom