raid
Dad Photographer
Does the Black Natura s by Fuji deserve mention?
yours
FPJ
I sold my Black Natura. The lens is awesome. There is hardly any distortion.
Does the Black Natura s by Fuji deserve mention?
yours
FPJ
Reading on CC's max speed, I'll guess if it is dictated by construction of aperture?
I thinks so. The Hexar AF - built 20 years after the "CC" and much more automated, had a similarly spec'd lens 35/2 (v the CC 35/1.8) and also had only a 2 blade leaf shutter and a top shutter speed of 1/250. Neither camera - especially the Hexar, was "low end". Wouldn't seem to be a cost-cutting measure. My guess is there is some physical limitation imposed by this lens spec (fast/wide) on shutter speed and shutter design with a leaf shutter. Kinda interesting. Would like to know if these assumptions are true (would seem to be) and why...
|
Interesting question. Given that shutters for LF lenses (though none as fast as f2,) are physically much larger and have speeds up 1/500, I don't think that's it. The AF is motor driven but the CC is not, so I don't think shot-to-shot performance is it either.
I voted for the Canon QL17 when this poll first came out, but I later sold mine and got a Yashica GX. It's miles ahead of the Canon in image quality, and a joy to use. This from a trip to Palermo last year:
http://sircarl.smugmug.com/photos/387888309_y6Ug6-XL.jpg
Why limit a higher-end RF like the Hexar AF to 1/250th top shutter speed? Why the 2-blade aperture?
|
Or even with the 40 Summicron!How about a Leica CL with a CV Nokton 40/1.4? 🙂