agentlossing
Well-known
Micro 4/3 lenses are almost universally excellent. It's a really undersung aspect of the format. For as small and (mostly) relatively inexpensive as most of them are, they are really very impressive.That small Lumix rig can produce many mightily impressive photos in the right hands and using RAW.
As the happy user of a now ancient Lumix GF1, I'm amazed as the quality that 14-42 zoom turns out. It's one of the secrets of the Lumix range - or maybe it's well-known and I'm still living under a large rock, as I ofttimes think I do.
Mine often goes with me on my outings to photograph 13th century temples in East and Central Java. I keep it ready for fast and easy candids and it never disappoints or fails to impress with the results I get.
Someone recently told me the Lumix zooms were rebranded as Leica glass for their smaller cameras. Unsure if this is accurate or not. Someone here can please advise.
I also have the Lumix 50-150 zoom but after six years, I've never used it. I should and I will, soon.
I believe the Panasonic lenses which have Leica design input are all marked as such, and typically referred to as "Pana-Leicas" by users. Quite a few of their lineup bear the Leica tag, going as far back I believe as their original 25mm f1.4.