character vs. a neutral lens...part 2

[semilog]

That is incorrect, although correct about the shade.

Any guesses as to the lens? Does it have character?

Not in this picture. It could be any of two dozen 50's.

That, by the way, is not a criticism of the picture.

 

[splitimageview]

Well, it's not any of two dozen of 50s. Any other guesses? 🙂

 

[semilog]

I'm stumped.

 

[RF_newbie]

I still think its a sony mavica 😉

 

[splitimageview]

It's definitely not a sony mavica (haha!) and it's not a 50.

It's not a tessar, and it's got modern multi coating. The lens had very little use when I owned it, and was never dirty. I bought it new.

It is, in fact, a Panasonic 14-45 zoom on a GH1.