plittman
Member
I think I know the answer to this, but thought id see what the forum had to say.
I have a CLE with the 40mm sum-c, 90mm elmar-c and new 28mm elmarit. I'm thinking about investing in an M6 + 50mm summicron, and use the other 2 existing lenses. Does anyone think the images are likely to be any better with the M6/50mm compared to the CLE / 40mm assuming the same user (me)? I like the idea of having a classic Leica, but if it is unlikely to produce any better images than the CLE, it's just not worth it. What do you all think? Thanks.
I have a CLE with the 40mm sum-c, 90mm elmar-c and new 28mm elmarit. I'm thinking about investing in an M6 + 50mm summicron, and use the other 2 existing lenses. Does anyone think the images are likely to be any better with the M6/50mm compared to the CLE / 40mm assuming the same user (me)? I like the idea of having a classic Leica, but if it is unlikely to produce any better images than the CLE, it's just not worth it. What do you all think? Thanks.