Vince Lupo
Whatever
Hi, this is my first post on this forum. I have a GF1 and E-P2, and have had great results with my Leica M lenses, ON the GF1!! BUT the E-P2 has been a very different story.
I have found focusing the GF1 very easy, and get very sharp results!! The E-P2 on the other hand is a pile of crap in comparison! I have not been able to get more than a few sharp results, even using the MF assist the results are very poor? I have tried both Leica and Voigtlander lenses on the E-P2, and both return poor shots.
I can even hyper-focus the GF1 and get stunning results!!
Anyone had similar problems with the E-P2, or do you think I my have a duff example?
Many thanks
Steve
Hmm...Although I can't specifically speak to the use of manual-focus lenses (my M-mount adapter is on the way though!), I don't really have too much trouble using the micro-4/3 specific lenses in MF mode. That said, I do prefer to use my E-P2 in AF mode. That electronic viewfinder is so nice, so if you do attempt to try it again, maybe make sure that the diopter adjustment in the EVF is adjusted to your eyes? I'm sure you've probably already done that, but I can't really think of anything else.
Who knows, once I get the M-adapter I may find the same focusing difficulties that you've experienced. But for now, I am extremely happy with my E-P2. It definitely fills a void for me (gives quality imagery in a relatively small and versatile package), and right now I'm actually shooting a magazine story with the camera.
I hope that you'll soon get be happier with your E-P2 and MF lenses.