I have a K100D : pretty much the same cam as !st and it's held it's value well. Paid $600 Aussie and now worth $300 or so (on the proverbial good day). I love the idea of the Epson but really can't justify the cost used (compared to a camera I own) or new (compared to an APS-C mirrorless). I bought a mirrorless to shoot my RF lenses in digital. Also shoots my Pentax lenses when I want modern sensor performance.
I have a K100D : pretty much the same cam as !st and it's held it's value well. Paid $600 Aussie and now worth $300 or so (on the proverbial good day). I love the idea of the Epson but really can't justify the cost used (compared to a camera I own) or new (compared to an APS-C mirrorless). I bought a mirrorless to shoot my RF lenses in digital. Also shoots my Pentax lenses when I want modern sensor performance.
I realize how RD-1 is different from DSLR, but once they aren't easily repairable (and for reasonable $) they become disposables - use while it works and toss when it stops. If RD-1 still can be repaired for less than 1/3 of comparable or better DRF....why not.
To each his/her own. I really like using different cameras. The "digital rangefinder experience" is a lot of fun and believe it or not, it has improved my photography... Nikon is fine, I have a D60 and a couple of lenses still (sold the telezoom and the primes). I had fun with it too, but the RD-1 is just much more interesting. I also shoot with M43 and DP2-Merrill. Each has it's strengths and weaknesses (quirkyness?). Anyway, I bought the RD-1 and several CV lenses as well. I have a lot of fun with it. 😀
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.