Assaf
Well-known
Hi fellows,
lately I started taking pictures with a very cute CL + 'cron 40.
I used it without a hood, only a multi coated UV filter. I didn't use the hood becaues I don't like hoods, and also because I never saw flare in the other lenses I use.
However, this lens showed some flare, like in the examples below:
My question is : do you think a hood could have helped in these situations?
If so, which one?
The kind RFF member who sold me the lens included both the original rubber hood, and also a vented metal hood, thread mount, with "39mm" engraved on it. Isn't it actually a hood for the 35mm lens?
Which one will be more effective, if at all?
I would like to add, that if I use the rubber hood, I'll put the original UV plain glass filter. If I use the vented hood, I'll connect it to the UV MRC filter, which will take it a bit farther away from the lens.
Thank you guys
Assaf
lately I started taking pictures with a very cute CL + 'cron 40.
I used it without a hood, only a multi coated UV filter. I didn't use the hood becaues I don't like hoods, and also because I never saw flare in the other lenses I use.
However, this lens showed some flare, like in the examples below:
My question is : do you think a hood could have helped in these situations?
If so, which one?
The kind RFF member who sold me the lens included both the original rubber hood, and also a vented metal hood, thread mount, with "39mm" engraved on it. Isn't it actually a hood for the 35mm lens?
Which one will be more effective, if at all?
I would like to add, that if I use the rubber hood, I'll put the original UV plain glass filter. If I use the vented hood, I'll connect it to the UV MRC filter, which will take it a bit farther away from the lens.
Thank you guys
Assaf
Last edited: