cmedin
Well-known
I just went through a roll with my newly acquired IIf. Lesson learned: the viewfinder is a little generous and I need to back off a bit to make sure stuff doesn't end up outside the frame.
However... half the roll was shot with an Industar-50, half with a Summar 50/2. Every single frame from the Industar had light streaks across it. Even the ones shot in open shade. It is not from the camera body; the light streaks were top-bottom in the prints whether they were vertical or horizontal. Even in shade, is this reasonable from a hoodless I-50?
The Summar shots, 11 out of 12 looked perfect. And I was blown away by how good this lens is at around 5.6 (guesstimating since it has the funky aperture markings on it).
What I'm wondering is, is the Industar defective or are they really this flare prone even without a light source in the image? The streaks look like light leaks, but with the Summar shots all-but-one having zero issues and every single Industar one having it, well...
However... half the roll was shot with an Industar-50, half with a Summar 50/2. Every single frame from the Industar had light streaks across it. Even the ones shot in open shade. It is not from the camera body; the light streaks were top-bottom in the prints whether they were vertical or horizontal. Even in shade, is this reasonable from a hoodless I-50?
The Summar shots, 11 out of 12 looked perfect. And I was blown away by how good this lens is at around 5.6 (guesstimating since it has the funky aperture markings on it).
What I'm wondering is, is the Industar defective or are they really this flare prone even without a light source in the image? The streaks look like light leaks, but with the Summar shots all-but-one having zero issues and every single Industar one having it, well...