Fuji Pro X1
- Thread starter bwcolor
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 20
- Views 21K
jsrockit
Moderator
About $1900 or so US? Not bad, but it better be significantly more robust than the X100 at that price (especially with a crop). The key though is how much are its lenses going to cost.
gavinlg
Veteran
Personally I can't wait to see this thing. It's going to be a genuine alternative to DSLRs for me.
bwcolor
Veteran
Given the rumor mill preceding the X100 launch, we should expect to know much more within the week.
Camera/Lens, assuming that this is a leak from Fuji, should be $2400-$2900. That price range should tame the early adopter rush. Anyway, the early purchase of the X100 was a no-brainer for me, but at this price I will probably hold off until we get some good user feedback. Besides, my wife has finally had it with my photo equipment spending. Need to sell..
Camera/Lens, assuming that this is a leak from Fuji, should be $2400-$2900. That price range should tame the early adopter rush. Anyway, the early purchase of the X100 was a no-brainer for me, but at this price I will probably hold off until we get some good user feedback. Besides, my wife has finally had it with my photo equipment spending. Need to sell..
keytarjunkie
no longer addicted
I can't wait to buy a X100 for $500!😀
malthusiantrap
Established
This is exactly what I was thinking too. If I get the X1 I'm probably gonna use it with 35mm lenses anyway so better go with the X100.
bwcolor
Veteran
benlees
Well-known
Would have to sell most of my cameras to get it. That means the GA645W would have to go. Zero chance!😱 Seriously, though; so glad Fuji is putting out this camera. Gives the market a kick in the ass!
Photon42
burn the box
An organic sensor means it keeps growing maybe. Scary ... 😱
Vobluda
Well-known
Leigh Youdale
Well-known
I'm very interested in this camera but I've just bought an X10 as my "go-anywhere" digital camera, and I'm wondering what (apart from being digital) the new Fuji will do that my M6 won't.
I'm sure it will be very good for what it is, but different enough or better enough to cause me to open my wallet? Have to wait another week or two to see.
I'm sure it will be very good for what it is, but different enough or better enough to cause me to open my wallet? Have to wait another week or two to see.
rbelyell
Well-known
well, it will be adaptable to shoot just about any lens ever made for one thing, and if its anything like the x100 it will allow you to shoot those lenses at 3200 and produce images as good as the best film cam using 400. the only negative i forsee vs film cam is that it will most probably not be fullframe. i do not enjoy shooting my lenses at some factor more than they were intended.
jsrockit
Moderator
rbelyell
Well-known
i dont know JS, honestly i think it'd be pretty darn close. at 800 it would be no contest. tbh ive never before seen consistent 3200 performance like the x100.
hub
Crazy French
Looks interesting on the paper. Now let's hope they didn't screw up the firmware like the X100 is.
Also I wonder how it will work with 3rd party lenses and the optical viewfinder.
Also I wonder how it will work with 3rd party lenses and the optical viewfinder.
gavinlg
Veteran
jsrockit
Moderator
I got one of those magical X100s as well...
rbelyell
Well-known
put mine down as another 'bigfoot'! never given me a moment's trouble. also, AF misses less than 5% of the time. yeah its a 'slow' cam, but nothing's perfect, except the images i get from it!
jsrockit
Moderator
The dynamic range isn't there at 3200 for it to be on par with 400 speed film. Now, is it better than 3200 speed film... no doubt.
