nighstar
eternal beginner
Ouch.
Well, like the nex-7 we know now in the right hands its is capable of some horrific imagery 🙂
obviously this camera isn't your cup of tea. please feel free to go comment in the thread of the camera that is. 🙄
Ouch.
Well, like the nex-7 we know now in the right hands its is capable of some horrific imagery 🙂
Fuji has admitted it has poor AF compared to D-SLRs. A $2000+ camera should not have inferior autofocus or anything else. Sorry.
Fuji has admitted it has poor AF compared to D-SLRs. A $2000+ camera should not have inferior autofocus or anything else. Sorry.
Lets try and compare apples to apples.
Fuji just gets it
Then what IS it about? Poor AF, just as I said it would have. Just as claact said. Poor performing overpriced jewelry for those with money and little else.
Fuji has admitted it has poor AF compared to D-SLRs. A $2000+ camera should not have inferior autofocus or anything else. Sorry.
A professional's tool should be able to handle all conditions without risk of missing shots when the going gets tough.
I really don't get the hostility.
And for the people who think it's a replacement for an M9 because of it's lower price and superior high ISO capability, watch and wait, because the M10 will be a very different camera IMO ... particularly regarding it's high ISO performance.
Too big and boxy, just like the M5. Cmon, if we're going to trot out such canards, lets at least be consistent.
The M-mount adapter is still in development, so nobody has been able to test it. I didn't see any way to enable focus peaking during my hands-on time with the camera at CES (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398807,00.asp), but I was fighting the crowd to get some time with the camera.
Looking forward to spending more time with a review unit.
Curious. Are you suggesting the M10 is going to be a lower priced model? Or just that its going to be markedly different?
I'm sort of guessing the M10 will hit the market somewhere around the $9,000 mark - just given Leica's track record of substantially raising the price of its digital rangefinder with each new version.
What??? You do know you can see side-by-side photos with an M9 and they're almost identical in size (i.e. meaning SMALLER than an M5).
I'm taking a break from reading this thread. RFF has gone from playful speculation to outright condemnation and vilification based on what? Information we don't even have yet! That or our own goofy feelings because it doesn't live up to some bizarre abstract concept we have of the "perfect" camera.
I think a lot of people need to go to the top right of their screen and hit the "log out" button, pick up whatever camera they have and go take a walk.
I'm excited about the X-Pro1 because it means the digital photography industry is growing and able to explore more of the shooting experience instead of just the technological aspects. The cheap full-frame rangefinder is another step closer to existing, and who couldn't be glad for that?