corposant
Member
i'd be happy if it was $149...like the canon 40!!
I really think it could be that inexpensive!
i'd be happy if it was $149...like the canon 40!!
i'd be happy if it was $149...like the canon 40!!
Where the heck is the 23/1.4?!
Nor did I think you did. I don't think I was being rude.
I guess the forum has just been full of people getting upset that cameras are being made that don't fit their requirements (Leica X-Vario, etc). I understand M lenses are a passion here, but it seems that for every camera that comes out (that has interchangeable lenses), people are upset that it does not work the way they want with their third party lenses.
How can someone get upset at a company, that isn't Leica, for making a body that accepts their lenses. To me, with all the mirrorless cameras out that accept m lenses, we should feel lucky. A few years ago, you bought M8/M9 or a Epson and there were no other options. No camera is perfect. Not even in film...and there is a long history there.
i'm getting more and more bummed about that pancake...
Seems a little steep for the pancake without an aperture ring. Hopefully that means it is great quality.
So that would make the new camera and this lens be a $1000 combo. Something doesn't seem right here.
not exactly entry level pricing, i don't think...
i think most people still see the dslr as a real camera, a good camera, a pro camera...i know some of my friends have a hard time understanding why i don't have a dslr if i'm so serious about photography.
Bingo. Nobody at my work (a very mainstream crowd) gives mirrorless any respect. They all assume the DSLR is the only Pro camera. My boss saw my Ricoh GR (APS-C compact) and couldn't believe I would use that or that it could give comparible results to a DSLR.
Btw u did show him some great results.. W/ the Ricoh to change his opinion, right?