steveyork
Well-known
The Canon 50mm 1.5 LTM is a relatively inexpensive lens and full of character.
The Canon 50mm 1.5 LTM is a relatively inexpensive lens and full of character.
Don't think I've seen the Canon 50mm f/1.4 LTM mentioned yet. Also relatively inexpensive, and should be plentiful on the 2nd hand market. There's a long thread (10 pages and counting) with image samples here:
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86792
It's my most used lens, and I also have some image samples in a Flickr album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dourbalistar/albums/72157694898508964
Don't think I've seen the Canon 50mm f/1.4 LTM mentioned yet. Also relatively inexpensive, and should be plentiful on the 2nd hand market. There's a long thread (10 pages and counting) with image samples here:
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86792
It's my most used lens, and I also have some image samples in a Flickr album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dourbalistar/albums/72157694898508964
My first impression was of a II, since it has no strap lugs. But it bothered me that it didn't look like a black paint finish (it didn't look like chrome either; more of a "dust" finish). So after Colker posted the serial number, I looked it up: Ko.Fe. called it right. It is a IIIa from 1935.
I was lucky enough to find a very clean example and have kept good quality B+W filters on the front since, so no scratches and no haze.
Mine is a 126xxxx
It was also the favorite lens of Cartier-Bresson!
Serial number of mine is 1319235 (LTM).
Leica MP, Summicron 50mm f/2 Collapsible, 400-2TMY.
(dull scans, I will print these soon on Adox MCC 110)
Erik.
![]()
Could you briefly tell me about the viewfinder fitted to the camera in your first image please? What is it; value? I have one here, but really don't know anything about it other than it seems very nice to look through. Recently several Leicas arrived with various 50mm lenses, and as a Leica newb I've been following this discussion with interest, trying to weigh up the pros and cons of various types.Ditto, mine is an earlier serial number from 1953.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lots of very nice 50s out there. Examples... the Nikkor 5cm f2 is great, a good Jupiter 8 is too, the Elmar 2.8, Industar 10, and the Konishiroku 5cm f3.5 is very sharp.
A couple of weeks ago I took a bunch of boring shots with my various 50s to see basic differences between them. All handheld and RF focused. On a few I think I missed focus a bit. Album here. For anyone that wants to see them. The Nikkor was CLA'd by Youxin Ye, the Summicron by DAG.
Shawn
My scans such a disappointment compared to darkroom prints !
The Lens 50mm Collapsible-Summicron is low contrast..
The group shot by Erik typical of this lens, the image stellar.
I don't advise buying one due to poor samples available..
The same for my M3, the best Leica ever but now really old and risk of viewfinder malfunction..
Could you briefly tell me about the viewfinder fitted to the camera in your first image please? What is it; value? I have one here, but really don't know anything about it other than it seems very nice to look through. Recently several Leicas arrived with various 50mm lenses, and as a Leica newb I've been following this discussion with interest, trying to weigh up the pros and cons of various types.