How good is the Helios 103?

I asked Grok:
The Helios-103 53mm f/1.8 is not directly derived from a Leica lens, though some vintage lens enthusiasts claim similarities to the Leica Summicron.
Most Helios lenses, like the famous Helios-44 series, are copies or derivatives of Carl Zeiss designs (specifically the Biotar formula, a Double-Gauss type). The Helios-103, produced by the Arsenal factory in Ukraine for Contax/Kiev rangefinder cameras starting around 1980, follows a similar Double-Gauss optical scheme (6 elements in 4 groups) and is often described as based on the Zeiss Biotar concept, symmetrical unlike Sonnar designs.
However, community discussions (e.g., on Reddit’s r/VintageLenses) cite Leica expert Malcolm Taylor identifying its optical cross-section as closely matching a late-1960s Leica Summicron 50mm f/2 (a Double-Gauss design). Some speculate the Soviets may have copied or adapted it without license, recalculating for f/1.8 aperture, 53mm focal length (to suit the Contax/Kiev register), and available Soviet glass types. This remains anecdotal and unconfirmed by official sources—most references tie Helios lenses broadly to post-WWII Zeiss influences rather than Leica.

In summary: It’s a modern Soviet Double-Gauss normal lens with high sharpness (reported 55/28 lines/mm center/edge), but its primary lineage is Zeiss-inspired, with possible unverified parallels to the Summicron.
 
I had it. It was nothing wrong lens.
Most of FSU lenses for rangefinders are nothing wrong items compared to cameras.
Even better than old Leitz lenses with too many issues with optics.
 
Back
Top Bottom