zwarte_kat
Well-known
Saying there is no shift can mislead people looking to buy this lens. It is there, it is inherent to the lens design. It's just that some people are more bothered by it than others. How much focus is acceptable is a subjective question.
You'll notice shift better on digital than on film, and mostly at close distances. Maybe some people focus on different parts of the subject. Many focus on the eyes, but others will focus on the outline of the head, which in this case might help adjust for the shift.
Personally (and see that I don't state a fact), I am fine with shooting normally at 2.0 and smaller, unless maybe at absolute minimum focus distance. At larger than 2.0, I move a bit forward, and haven't had a misfocus because of shift since the second roll with this lens. (My own mistakes are far more damaging to my images!) In the end, each person has to decide for him/herself if the shift is acceptable, or even visible at all. The answer cannot be gained from a forum IMHO.
M6, Neopan 400

2013-01-NEOOAN400-Sonnar111 by Rudy Shots, on Flickr

2013-01-NEOOAN400-Sonnar129 by Rudy Shots, on Flickr
You'll notice shift better on digital than on film, and mostly at close distances. Maybe some people focus on different parts of the subject. Many focus on the eyes, but others will focus on the outline of the head, which in this case might help adjust for the shift.
Personally (and see that I don't state a fact), I am fine with shooting normally at 2.0 and smaller, unless maybe at absolute minimum focus distance. At larger than 2.0, I move a bit forward, and haven't had a misfocus because of shift since the second roll with this lens. (My own mistakes are far more damaging to my images!) In the end, each person has to decide for him/herself if the shift is acceptable, or even visible at all. The answer cannot be gained from a forum IMHO.
M6, Neopan 400

2013-01-NEOOAN400-Sonnar111 by Rudy Shots, on Flickr

2013-01-NEOOAN400-Sonnar129 by Rudy Shots, on Flickr