Damaso
Photojournalist
[/quote]I sort of agree. Yet I have not looked at that many of your photos - so could be mistaken. I also wonder - do you have Photography background to be able to teach? Or just based on you hobby/experience?[/quote]
I don't think you need a "background" in photography to teach though I did attend NYU's photography department, have been published widely in the United States, Europe and Asia as well as exhibited in the United States and Europe.
I'm not sure that "qualifies" me. What's interesting is that people would make a judgment about my work without seeing more of it. Between my two websites I probably have a few hundred images on the web. Having worked as a photojournalist for fifteen years I feel that gives me a pretty good background. But as I've said my work isn't everyone's cup of tea nor should it be.
Of course as I recall in college many of my best teachers were not impressive images makers themselves. Few acting teachers are great actors themselves but for whatever reason they are very good at helping people to learn how to act. I am a working photojournalist (unlike a lot of people on this board) so I consider myself a practitioner as well as an instructor. Sure the money from teaching is nice but in reality I much more enjoy helping people to learn to express themselves through photography.
Some people posting in this thread may not like how I express myself photographically (I happen to think heads are evil and should almost always be cut off in photos 🙄) but I challenge any naysayers to have a look at my body of work and then say I'm not able to express myself through images. The two are very different things...
[/quote]
I don't think you need a "background" in photography to teach though I did attend NYU's photography department, have been published widely in the United States, Europe and Asia as well as exhibited in the United States and Europe.
I'm not sure that "qualifies" me. What's interesting is that people would make a judgment about my work without seeing more of it. Between my two websites I probably have a few hundred images on the web. Having worked as a photojournalist for fifteen years I feel that gives me a pretty good background. But as I've said my work isn't everyone's cup of tea nor should it be.
Of course as I recall in college many of my best teachers were not impressive images makers themselves. Few acting teachers are great actors themselves but for whatever reason they are very good at helping people to learn how to act. I am a working photojournalist (unlike a lot of people on this board) so I consider myself a practitioner as well as an instructor. Sure the money from teaching is nice but in reality I much more enjoy helping people to learn to express themselves through photography.
Some people posting in this thread may not like how I express myself photographically (I happen to think heads are evil and should almost always be cut off in photos 🙄) but I challenge any naysayers to have a look at my body of work and then say I'm not able to express myself through images. The two are very different things...
[/quote]
Last edited: