I teach one on one classes

[/quote]I sort of agree. Yet I have not looked at that many of your photos - so could be mistaken. I also wonder - do you have Photography background to be able to teach? Or just based on you hobby/experience?[/quote]

I don't think you need a "background" in photography to teach though I did attend NYU's photography department, have been published widely in the United States, Europe and Asia as well as exhibited in the United States and Europe.

I'm not sure that "qualifies" me. What's interesting is that people would make a judgment about my work without seeing more of it. Between my two websites I probably have a few hundred images on the web. Having worked as a photojournalist for fifteen years I feel that gives me a pretty good background. But as I've said my work isn't everyone's cup of tea nor should it be.

4043519522_d2acdb1183_o.jpg


Of course as I recall in college many of my best teachers were not impressive images makers themselves. Few acting teachers are great actors themselves but for whatever reason they are very good at helping people to learn how to act. I am a working photojournalist (unlike a lot of people on this board) so I consider myself a practitioner as well as an instructor. Sure the money from teaching is nice but in reality I much more enjoy helping people to learn to express themselves through photography.

Some people posting in this thread may not like how I express myself photographically (I happen to think heads are evil and should almost always be cut off in photos :rolleyes:) but I challenge any naysayers to have a look at my body of work and then say I'm not able to express myself through images. The two are very different things...

4043518872_874c9404cd_o.jpg


[/quote]
 
Last edited:
teaching is about passing on knowledge, skills, process and technique. it occurs at all levels. if you can give someone something they didn't possess before taking your one-on-ones, then you are qualified. we all have a lot to learn. the best arbiters of whether you are qualified are actually your students. if they feel they're gaining something, then you've proved your worth.
 
did anyone notice norvenka's join date?
he joined just to make a negative comment, not a good way to start and not someone i want here.
 
did anyone notice norvenka's join date?
he joined just to make a negative comment, not a good way to start and not someone i want here.

I noticed that too and was a bit surprised by it. One of the things that annoys me about online forums (not just this one) is how people can drop in and make anonymous negative comments they would never dare say to someone's face. Then again perhaps a sense of freedom is what keeps things lively? I guess that's why we need to have great mods like you!

4043519096_a1d08356fe_o.jpg

What thread would be complete without a photo of a llama in France?
 
The detractors in this thread has an amusing "base."

I don't even have to know about his extremely credible experiences to realize that Damaso is qualified to teach others about photography. His pictures are interesting and captivating.

Good luck with the gigs, Damaso. If you have any tips to share on how to get people to be interested enough to learn photography seriously (as your student has shown), feel free to share :)
 
What thread would be complete without a photo of a llama in France?

What thread indeed? :)

I'd be interested to hear how you find students and what your instruction consists of. I can't imagine that anyone would want to pay me for such a service, but I'm curious.
 
Teach AND learn....

Teach AND learn....

First, let me say I applaud Damaso for opening this thread and doing the work he does. The ability to share information in an instructional way, and help another person to progress in their life, is a true blessing.

I teach Community Education classes at the local Community College. I've been doing this since 1992 at the same college. The community ed classes are not credit courses and the requirements for instructors do not require teaching certification or higher ed degrees. Most junior colleges are always looking for instructors who will teach classes that will draw students for income. As with most businesses (and believe me, colleges are businesses first and foremost), if you can provide a class that will show a profit, you will be considered to instruct.

These classes also spin off a good amount of one on one tutoring.

The college typically does not provide a curriculum or class outline. The instructor does all this and submits it for consideration/approval. Over the years, I have taught:

Computer configuration and construction (Build your own Computer)
Windows (Basics I and II) clear back to Windows 3.0
File Management (File It and Find It)
Managing Your Photographic Image Files
Making Money Using EBay
Buy and Sell on eBay
Digital Photography
Photoshop Elements

I teach these classes for three reasons. 1) I like to share information with people. 2) I hone my own skills. 3) I make money.

I have rarely taught any of these classes without learning something from one or two students in each class. So I don't worry too much about knowing more than everybody in class. Also class preparation of student handouts is a learning experience.

Classes are typically 6 to 8 hours in various session formats. They are usually on Saturdays or evenings. Saturdays are usually 6 hours (really too much info in a short time for many people) or in two or three sessions 2.5 to 3 hours long.

I also teach similar subjects at the local Senior Centers. These people are truly hungry for this kind of help.

Community Ed classes here generally pay instructors $20 to $25 per hour (session time). Perhaps not a lot of money for some, but I pick up considerable opportunity for computer work and one on one assistance on the side.

I would encourage anyone with an interest in assisting others and learning in the meantime, as well as adding to your own resume.

I have no teaching credentials. I have worked on computers for about 20 plus years, but no certifications there. My photography background is simply having practiced as a hobby for about 40 years, off and on.

And lastly, it's really been quite fun. The classes are easy going and if you simply present good information in an understandable format, participation is good. Over the last 18 years, I have developed a good following and referral base. I am also highly regarded in the Community Ed department. But Hey, I'm a really nice guy!!

Contact your local Community Ed departments to see what they want, or present an idea for a class to them. They are charged with the responsibility to add and provide classes that will generate income for the institution.
 
Last edited:
I started to teach photo to friens in Paris

I had never done that before, it is quite interesting, and funny how teaching technique can be easy , but teaching framing, waiting for the good moment etc can be hard. :D

Anyway I really enjoy it :)
 
Are you asking Damaso or me????

Are you asking Damaso or me????

Glad you are enjoying teaching, what are your views on censorship, what would you tell your students?

The issue of censorship is not relevant in my classes. I am not in a position to render legal opinions, and certainly not to put the college in that position. I am not a lawyer. I'd be willing to discuss that in an informal discussion outside the venue of the college.

Sounds like a copout. But remember, when you have 6 to 8 hours to teach certain subject matter to students, it's a misuse of class time to get involved in an endless discussion that's likely of interest ONLY to the person who asks the question.

Now, If the college wanted to have me teach a class strictly on censorship....... Oh Wait... I'm still not an attorney. Do you understand the liability for the college. Some government agency might slip in a "troll" and federal or municipal grant money for education may be at stake.

It's important to think about your subject content when acting as an agent for others.

People in my classes often ask me about the tax consequences of selling on eBay. That's a hands off question. I am clear in my classes that taxes on eBay transactions is between the seller, their accountant or legal advisor, and the IRS or local taxing bodies.

I do respond that eBay/Paypal does not ask for Social Security or Tax ID numbers and won't do so as long as they are not required to. Does that mean the income is not taxable. Not necessarily... ask your accountant or legal adviser.
 
Last edited:
did anyone notice norvenka's join date?
he joined just to make a negative comment, not a good way to start and not someone i want here.

And lo and behold he is not here anymore.

As one who teaches and shows work I find nothing wrong with giving or getting harsh criticism. I find it useful sometimes to put people in the position of having to defend the decisions made in image-making. There are plenty of people who won't respond without a 'mean' comment to get them started. I always start the first crit with something like: "Say anything, but hear everything with the understanding that everyone is as entitled to their opinion as you are to yours. The best criticism is honest criticism, and if you are not being honest then you are not doing your part. If you have a hard time hearing that someone dislikes your work then you are in the wrong place."

I don't see what was so harsh about our late friends comment as quoted. It was removed before I read the thread.
 
Having checked the website I like the work and can imagine Damaso as a good teacher.

That said ... after reading back through this thread and musing over what Norvenka wrote, which was after all a personal opinion, I don't think he/she was being far enough out of line to warrant extermination ... which appears to be what has happened?

That's some serious over moderation going on there and being the democracy that we are (I hope) I would like to voice and register my personal dissaproval of this action. :(
 
Last edited:
I think that the post was inappropriate as a first post by a new member. It struck me as mean-spirited and not a constructive criticism.

Over-moderation here? Are you kidding Keith?
 
I think that the post was inappropriate as a first post by a new member. It struck me as mean-spirited and not a constructive criticism.

Over-moderation here? Are you kidding Keith?


For this example I'm talking about and why would a warning not have been sufficient?

Generally this place is nirvana in internet forum terms ... but hey what would I know!
 
Last edited:
what you might not know is what happens behind the scenes and what info the admin might have that you are not privy to.

on a personal note, i find it disappointing that someone who registers today gets the benefit of the doubt while i do not.
 
what you might not know is what happens behind the scenes and what info the admin might have that you are not privy to.

on a personal note, i find it disappointing that someone who registers today gets the benefit of the doubt while i do not.


So possibly the poster was a previous trouble maker who registered through the back door but was identified by an IP?

If that's the case I retreat to my corner because I have no issue with you Joe!
 
Back
Top Bottom