JimG
dogzen
Nice lens except for it's tendancy to flare at any reflection, (no suprise being uncoated). So does anyone know the filter thread size, (32mm?) so I can get an adapter for a lens hood.
je2a3
je
JimG said:Nice lens except for it's tendancy to flare at any reflection, (no suprise being uncoated). So does anyone know the filter thread size, (32mm?) so I can get an adapter for a lens hood.
The collapsible version doesn't have filter threads, so you need an A36 clamp on hood like the Leitz Fison or a series VI equivalent with a 36mm push-on ring. Some FSU dealers like alex-photo sell a push on metal or plastic hood. All these options should work on the I-10, I-22 and 1-50/rigid I-50.
Hope this helps!
Joseph
je2a3
je
AFAIK the rigid black I-50 is the last version with coating, so Daniel is right. If you shine a light source on the front element it should give a purplish tint uncoated lenses are clear.
Joseph
Joseph
JimG
dogzen
je2a3 said:AFAIK the rigid black I-50 is the last version with coating, so Daniel is right. If you shine a light source on the front element it should give a purplish tint uncoated lenses are clear.
Joseph
Your right Joseph I can see it with a flashlight. Thanks'
Jim
S
Scarpia
Guest
The filter thread size of the rigid Industar 50 is 33mm. I don't know where you can find a filter this size these days. My Industar 50 also exhibits flare from bright reflections and it certainly is coated.JimG said:Nice lens except for it's tendancy to flare at any reflection, (no suprise being uncoated). So does anyone know the filter thread size, (32mm?) so I can get an adapter for a lens hood.
Kurt M.
JimG
dogzen
There are only very slight cleaning marks Daniel. Reexamining the photos I noticed that a couple were shot shot towards the sun with NO flare. The ones that show flare were of a highly reflective chrome surface. Maybe I need to better adjust my f stop (to compensate) for this.
Jim
Jim
w3rk5
Well-known
Kurt M. is right. The filter size of your I-50 is 33mm. What you would have to do is to buy a 33mm-??mm step up ring in order to mount filters or a lens hood.
JimG
dogzen
w3rk5 said:Kurt M. is right. The filter size of your I-50 is 33mm. What you would have to do is to buy a 33mm-??mm step up ring in order to mount filters or a lens hood.
Sounds good, will I need to remove it to change the f stop since the adjustment ring is at the very end of the barrel?
w3rk5
Well-known
You don't need to remove the step up ring, filter, or lens hood. On the rigid I-50 I had, I changed the f stop by turning the lens hood. Then again, the f stop adjustment ring was a little loose and sloppy.
Check out this link. I have a pic of the I-50 with a 33-37mm step up ring and a 37mm lens hood. I got both items from *bay.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12581
Check out this link. I have a pic of the I-50 with a 33-37mm step up ring and a 37mm lens hood. I got both items from *bay.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12581
Last edited:
ZorkiKat
ЗоркийК&
JimG said:Oops, I just noticed you said ALL Industar lenses were coated. Maybe it's not an Industar or I'm not seeing the coating?
All Industar 50 were coated- they were introduced in an era when all lenses were already coated. That black I-50 is already coated- though its coating may not be as obvious.
In the times when coating was new, up till perhaps the early 1960s, Soviet lenses were marked with a red "П" to note that the lens was coated. Just like what Zeiss did when they put red "T" on their lens's ID rings.
The white aluminium I-50 really qualifies (if it isn't yet) for the title 'ugliest' lens on the planet. It could be jazzed up a bit to make it more tolerable
http://www.jay.fedka.com/index_files/Page521.htm
Lens hoods are really effective. You can make them in a pinch if you can't find any to fit your lens. See bottom of this page:
http://www.jay.fedka.com/index_files/Page323.htm
JimG
dogzen
Daniel, Looking at yours and other members photos taken with FSU lenses I can see how their lens designs were based on Leitz and Zeiss design. However the results are I think are distinct, different. Maybe it's only my imagination but I really that unique FSU look.
Reagan warned me that FSU gear was addictive when I got my FED2. I should have listened to him, now I'm looking for a Jupitar8.
ZorkiKat, Good information >>In the times when coating was new, up till perhaps the early 1960s, Soviet lenses were marked with a red "?" to note that the lens was coated. Just like what Zeiss did when they put red "T" on their lens's ID rings<< Thanks' I'll know next time.
Reagan warned me that FSU gear was addictive when I got my FED2. I should have listened to him, now I'm looking for a Jupitar8.
ZorkiKat, Good information >>In the times when coating was new, up till perhaps the early 1960s, Soviet lenses were marked with a red "?" to note that the lens was coated. Just like what Zeiss did when they put red "T" on their lens's ID rings<< Thanks' I'll know next time.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.