rdeleskie
Well-known
I own all three, and while I like the images the NEX5N produces very much, the menus are the worst I've ever used (I've used Nikon, Canon, Panasonic, Olympus, Ricoh and Leica digital cameras). Placing camera controls such as flash compensation and meter mode into "brightness/colour" (which sounds like it should be connected with playback, LCD options or possibly image post-processing) while "flash mode" and "soft skin" (whatever that is) remain under "camera" strikes me as perverse and frankly still confuses me after several weeks. I also don't care at all for the touch screen implementation. It's not as responsive as the iPhone, and not as fully featured as, say, the Panasonic GH2. I avoid it like the plague.
To each their own. I love the peaking, have grown accustomed to the ergonomics particularly with MF lenses, and the image quality is really top notch. The camera looks like some kind of cruel joke with the plastic kit lens, but slap a black metal MF prime on it and it's the belle of the ball. I don't find it a match for the M8 in terms of what I look for in IQ, but I much prefer the output to any of the M43 cameras I have used, and it goes places I wouldn't take a DSLR. For me it's a keeper.
To each their own. I love the peaking, have grown accustomed to the ergonomics particularly with MF lenses, and the image quality is really top notch. The camera looks like some kind of cruel joke with the plastic kit lens, but slap a black metal MF prime on it and it's the belle of the ball. I don't find it a match for the M8 in terms of what I look for in IQ, but I much prefer the output to any of the M43 cameras I have used, and it goes places I wouldn't take a DSLR. For me it's a keeper.