Leica Elmar 50mm F2.8

Moriturii

Well-known
Local time
1:16 AM
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
647
Ok, I am thinking of buying this lens because it's so compact and I can't get over how gorgeous the aperture blades look (I got my priorities right, right? :cool:).

So, 1) Show me some of your pictures with this lens that you like, may or may not be your own pictures. And 2) Put in a few good or bad words about this lens.

Cheers.

PS: I've been looking for that long thread where someone said they were a bit disappointed that their Leicas wasn't as quiet as they thought a Leica would be once they got their first Leica. I just got an M2, and I am stunned at how quiet it is. My Nikon F3 and F4 in comparison (which is now up for sale) sounds like a aircraft-hangar door closing. Amazing. I feel like a perv now! :)
 
Elmar is sooo sweet, man I love it on my M3. just for now 1 shot, in two weeks I expect to have much more, as I'm taking it to Istanbul.

img641.jpg

Expired Gold 100 @2.8
 
Leica M2, Elmar 50mm f/2.8 (old), Tmax400, silvergelatineprint.

I like this lens, but there are many versions. There are at least three different coatings. My version, 1728XXX, has a pink coating and is rather soft. It is however very sharp and very even across the whole frame like a reproduction lens.

Erik.

9816852305_d88d73c535_c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Definitely going to get this lens. I am more of a 50 guy then 35. And I love the idea, look and feel of a 50 on a M2 rather then M3.

Edit: Just found THIS thread for those who are interested in more. Quite a bit of talk between the 2.8 and 3.5 version. Interesting.
 
Last edited:
I love mine. The only possible complaint is that the barrel rotates when focusing, but I got used to that very quickly. Mine is the old LTM version.

U2935I1241282187.SEQ.0.jpg


U2935I1242869623.SEQ.0.jpg


U2935I1234113891.SEQ.0.jpg


U2935I1206114722.SEQ.0.jpg
 
I have one Elmar and being cloudy I sent it to Sherry to be cleaned. I almost think the photos were better before cleaning. Anyway now the apeture blades move easily and it feels like new.
Joe
 
I had the older version of this lens in LTM mount. It produced some nice photos, although it did have a tendency to flare. In the end, I sold it, b/c I just wasn't using it that much compared to my other 50s, and as landscape lenses, I prefer my Elmar 50/3.5 and Skopar 50/2.5. The 2.8 I had was very well made, with clear glass. Had it been my only 50, I would have happily kept it. Here's one sample shot:
3791511420_d36fdd32bd_o.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom