Don't get me wrong please and apologise if You feel offend, probably you're right about prints vs screen, but at the end why You want that greaaaat tool if not to maximize the qualities from it? Waste of money in my opinion.
Anyway I'm not pointing particulary. I sold mine three times... Bad done.
I would love to see in London someone who show me a good print and convince me to sell my analog equipment and fall in love with MM again. Beers on my own!
One thng I noticed is how difficult is to handle the highlights, maybe I'm trying to find an analog feel when the MM is provide for another things.
I think many things in life could be considered a 'waste of money' -- who knows, there may be things in
your life that others might consider a 'waste of money'. A car? Talk about depreciation! A house? You'll likely never get all the money back you put into it. Jewelry? Complete frivolity. And to pay the insurance for all of that? Let's not go there. How about an expensive dinner out? Cheaper to stay home and cook for yourself! I could go on and on. So really, what may be a waste of money to one person is definitely in the eye of the beholder.
For me, I'm pretty happy with the camera - for its ergonomics, its appearance, its functions, and of course the results it produces. And here again, this is just MY personal opinion - for my working methods, the way it integrates with the rest of my photographic workflow and for my creative life. And really, that's good enough for me. It's a camera I could use for the next 20 years and be completely (well mostly, anyways!) happy with. I personally consider it to have been well worth the money. But as I say, this is just for me.
A word about the highlights -- You've heard the saying 'expose for the shadows, develop for the highlights'? Well, with the Monochrom, I've found the opposite to be true: Expose for the highlights, 'develop' for the shadows ('develop' being 'post-production'). Just shoot with it as though you have slide film in the camera, and for the most part you should be fine. Unless I'm shooting something in which the majority is in shadow and there's a pocket of bright sunshine hitting, say, someone wearing a white shirt, I've never had a problem with highlight rendering. Yes, there is a 'learning' that takes place with the Monochrom - definitely different than shooting with the M9, at least that's what I found. And then once I got it (mostly) figured out, then I could concentrate on those other elements that I mentioned in my earlier post -- composition, light, and of course the moment.
As far as speaking the 'truth', I welcome it. If you have critiques about my images, I'd love to learn about what I may or may not be doing correctly. Or if my composition, light, moment, or post-production aren't quite working, I'm all ears. Always room for improvement, to be sure, and I'm confident others here feel the same way. I certainly don't need to be coddled, but of course sincere compliments are greatly appreciated.
I wish I could come to London and show you some prints (let's not spill the beer on them please!). I don't know if you'd necessarily have this 'Oh my God' revelation, but when exposed and 'developed' properly, they are quite satisfying to behold. I'm happy with the results I've been getting with the Monochrom and my Epson 3880 printer, but I'm sure there's always room for improvement. But you have given me an idea -- I have never made a print from any of my iPhone photos. Hmm, maybe I should in fact do a side-by-side comparison with the Monochrom and my iPhone to see if there really is a difference. Who knows - you may be right!
Thanks for allowing me to stretch my legs here with this extended post. I appreciate everyone's input in this thread.
BTW everyone seems to talk about the 'film-like' qualities of the Monochrom -- not that it really matters, but for me this is really the only image of mine whose resulting print has caused me to pause and say 'that looks like film':
DC2013-2 by
Vince.Lupo, on Flickr