Michel.Roth
Established
Michel.Roth
Established
JHP
Well-known

summilux version 2
ektar 100 - my favourite colour film.
JHP
Well-known

Watching a rugby game, rural New Zealand.
summilux version 2
neopan 400
JHP
Well-known

summilux version 2
ektar 100 (bw conversion in silver efex)
maggieo
More Deadly
M9-P and my 1st version Summilux...

Scooter, September 27, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Sue, October 03, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

SFO Skytrain, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

At Kitcho Restaurant, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
And some color:

The Benjamin Franklin Hotel, San Mateo, CA, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Michael Looks at Lenses, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Gin and Tonics, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

The Mixologist, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Scooter, September 27, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Sue, October 03, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

SFO Skytrain, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

At Kitcho Restaurant, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
And some color:

The Benjamin Franklin Hotel, San Mateo, CA, October 05, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Michael Looks at Lenses, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

Gin and Tonics, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr

The Mixologist, October 08, 2012 by Maggie Osterberg, on Flickr
sanmich
Veteran
How is the Pre-asph Summilux in terms of distortion?
I have sold my canon 50mm 1.4 which is otherwise an excellent lens because of its level of distortion, and I wonder how is the lux in that matter (I frankly doubt it can be sharper than the canon)
ferider
Veteran
They are quite similar, Michael. The Summilux barrel distorts noticeably.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
They are quite similar, Michael. The Summilux barrel distorts noticeably.
Yes, this is true. The version 2 is completely corrected for coma, but at the cost of severe barrel distortion. Version 1 does not distort, but shows coma at the bigger apertures.
Personally I would choose version 1. I do not like the distortion at all, therefore I no longer use version 2.
The only way to avoid both abbarations is to use the aspherical Summilux.
Erik.
sanmich
Veteran
The only way to avoid both abbarations is to use the aspherical Summilux.
Erik.
At the current prices, I'll live with F/2 and push my film in extreme situations. (or try Delta 3200 one day?)
Meanwhile, thanks Roland and Erik for your insights.
minhthuy
Member
lux ver 1 - kodak 200

jcrutcher
Veteran
photony texas
Light Sensitive

Bat Girl by phOtOny teXas, on Flickr

Cat Girl by phOtOny teXas, on Flickr

Blood Bride by phOtOny teXas, on Flickr
seanbonner
Established

Tired Tara by seanbonner, on Flickr

Ripley by seanbonner, on Flickr

Sleepy by seanbonner, on Flickr

Sleepy by seanbonner, on Flickr
Cron
Well-known
Leica M6 + 1,4/50 preasph with Kodak Elite slidefilm

jcrutcher
Veteran
LChanyungco
Well-known
jcrutcher
Veteran

M6TCF100-(4)Scan-121206-0001-Edit.jpg by rootbeer2004, on Flickr
M6, 50 Lux version 2, Acros 100
peaceful study Hall
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.