LTM to M adaptors..

RdEoSg

Well-known
Local time
7:30 AM
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
774
Location
Southern California
I did a search and found a lot of information on what it is exactly, but what I really want to know is which adaptors you guys use and recomend. I did a quick ebay check and found a few here and there for as much as $100 for a Leitz one and as little as $6 for a who knows what one!
 
One of the few times I kinda sorta got lucky on ebay: 2 Leitz adapters for $30 & $50. I was in a hurry and did the Buy it Now thing on the one for $50. Be patient.
 
I got lucky, an ebay 35 notched no name, works perfect for aobut $25 shipped. even has a red dot marker. could have used a bit more polishing, but I was more interested in the mechanical fit, and infinity focus support.
 
Thanks everyone. After reading your horror story pmu I think I am definatly going to stick to a real Leitz or voightlander adaptor and hope that they are ok! I don't actually own any thread mount lenses, but we have them at the shop here that I work at usually so it would be fun to be able to take them home on occasion for a shot or two... and who knows.. I might buy one some time.. Lord knows I am already addicted enough....
 
One of the ebay ads does mention 35/135 use, but the other does not say anything. Some frameline just has to come up though. I guess on something like a CV with the frameline switch it wouldn't matter..
 
Correct about the CV. I would shy away from these adapters. The CV adapters have a good reputation, the Marumi ones are good (and cheaper than CV) and then there is Leitz. I have all three and they are all fine. I have a bunch of the Marumi ones and they are excellent. They don't seem to be sold on eBay any more though... 🙁
 
ferider said:
It depends which lenses you want to use. For 50/1.4 + 85/2 and faster, and in particular long throw lenses like Nikkors, buy a Leitz adapter. If you are patient they cost around US 40-50 in good shape. For slower lenses, CV and Marumi are good choices.

Roland.


why would a CV adapter be not good for 50/1.5? I wanted to get one to be able to use J-3
 
lubitel said:
ferider said:
It depends which lenses you want to use. For 50/1.4 + 85/2 and faster, and in particular long throw lenses like Nikkors, buy a Leitz adapter. If you are patient they cost around US 40-50 in good shape. For slower lenses, CV and Marumi are good choices.
why would a CV adapter be not good for 50/1.5? I wanted to get one to be able to use J-3

It's because fast lenses have very stringent requirements regarding build tolerances, and people think a Leitz adapter is more likely to satisfy these than a Cosina/Voigtländer adapter.

Personally I think a company that is capable of building a 50/f1.5 Nokton with consistent quality is capable of building metal adapters with consistent thickness.

Philipp
 
Last edited:
I have observed the difference with several of my Nikkor lenses and my M3. On cameras with a shorter EBL it matters much less.
Obviously you know your gear best, however this is still anectodal evidence in a sample of size 1 with a lot of variables.

Everybody including me is aware that there are quality differences between adapter brands, and I'm not going to argue that no-name $3 Chinese adapters made from recycled Coke cans are as consistent as Leitz adapters.

But at the high end of the scale, which is what we're talking about here, I don't think you can draw the conclusion that CV adapters are generally worse than Leitz adapters. It may be the case with your particular body/lens/adapter combination. I've just done a number of quick searches here on RFF, and from that I can't see either that Voigtländer adapters would have a consistent bad rap. Maybe you've just got a bad adapter - that can happen, but that's what warranties are for!

As my equipment list might demonstrate, I am quite un-emotional about equipment manufacturer
But then I'm not saying that. All I'm saying is that one shouldn't overestimate differences between high-end manufacturers of precision goods (and CV certainly is one in comparison with other adapter makers) with what is essentially a very primitive product.

You look at the back of a used Leitz adapter, and you typically see brassing, which might cause the difference.
I hope it doesn't! If it does, it means the adapter was too thick when it left the factory.

Maybe Leitz used to make them too thick and then ground them down individually to proper thickness, it sounds like the sort of thing they might have done with their "adjust-to-fit" attitude, before the 1970's, anyway. But I somehow don't think so.

Wear on the contact surfaces is one of the theoretical problems with most bayonet and screw mounts (and there are mounts designed to avoid this, such as Canon FD or Pentacon Six), but I think you would have to change lenses pretty often to cause enough substantial wear that the focusing difference will actually be significant in comparison to plain old body and lens adjustment problems - and in this case you can just put a layer of paint on your adapter.

Philipp
 
I have a 50mm Leitz adaptor that use on my Summitar and M3 that I picked up on Ebay for about $25. Then, I have a 90mm "Made in Japan" generic adaptor that came with the Elmar 9cm I bought for $100. It works perfectly. You can buy the Leitz adaptors for reasonable prices if you are patient.
 
I have one of the generic cheap adaptors I was asking about several posts ago and I didn't even know it!
I recently bought a 35/2.5 color skopar- first pancake type, used but as new with the adaptor on it already. I noticed when I put the lens on my m5 that the focus/f-stop dot did not go all the way to verticle but the bayonet button did click. I unscrewed the lens from the mounted adaptor and noticed it had no writing engraved at all, but did bring up the 35 lines in the m5 finder.
The same lens in a CV adaptor lines up correctly, that is the reference dot is at the 'top' where it should be.
Also some of the milling of the nameless adaptor looks like the mill was either too dull or too fast, as the milling marks are not as fine as the CV.
Since there are no markings on this thing, I don't know if it is or is not one of the ones seen on ebay where the shipping is more than the adaptor.
This one is made of chrome plated brass rather than pressed drink cans though.
Other than the lineup thing, it works fine I think.
 
Back
Top Bottom