Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
Full Frame or go home
And I hear Reuters won't accept Fuji JPEGs 😉
Full-frame is for wimps! 😛
Full Frame or go home
And I hear Reuters won't accept Fuji JPEGs 😉
NOT FAIR bringing a FujiX to a Leica fight!
Full Frame or go home
And I hear Reuters won't accept Fuji JPEGs 😉
And at the same time get the bonus of your lenses suddenly becoming: 28mm>35mm, 35mm>50mm, 50mm>75mm, 90mm>135mm... Yes, exactly what everyone wants!
Hehe... the Fuji is full frame. It the full aps-c frame 😛
(and being an AF user....I really like it and the small lenses!! )
I think they missed a trick on this one , if they could have just made it a bit smaller I think it would have tempted some 240 owners to switch ... And therefore sold more cameras. I certainly wood have as the size is the one thing that bugs me about my M240
I do not think they have any interest for M240 owners to switch. This is an ME successor which caters to the no-video, no-EVF crowd.
I think it ticks all the boxes for the intended customer group.
Who are you talking to?Errr... That is a Sony NEX you are describing except from the RF, available from your friendly camera store...🙄
If they really want to do something interesting, ditch the whole concept of making it look like the film Ms.
The digital Leicas, as much as I love my M9 are basically the equivalent of horseless carriages.
Start from scratch, design a body around a full frame sensor rather than a roll of film. Make it lighter. Put a grip on it for gods sake. Give it an M mount, a shutter speed dial, a range finder and little else.
Do another one with live view and video for more money that fits inside the same body.
Make it beautiful and functional and feel like it was always supposed to be this way. Produce it for 50 years and keep improving it.
Ah, the fullframe X-Pro2 with a thin filter stack. They even made the video usable this time. Thanks, Fuji.Wait until mid January when you can buy the X-Pro2.
And the new silent shutter in Typ 262 doesn't even get a single mention in this thread?!
RFF has become a strange place. Let's rename it to LVF (Live View Forum)...
More silent shutter, higher ISO, higher resolution, higher dynamic range,possibly more reliable, that sounds like an upgrade from the M9/ME to me.I don't think removing features is the way forward. At this point I wouldn't even consider upgrading from (or in addition) my M9 unless the video and LV functions were part of the deal. But I do some commercial video so that's why.
But personally I'm more interested in the Monochrom ultimately, as an additional camera to the M9. The M240 and newer cameras don't really seem all that better than the M9, except high ISO, which I have other cameras already that works better for that.