kmallick
Well-known
Frame lines are lit with LEDs like the Leica M9 Titanium.
ahhh, ok. now understood.
all said and done, I will be anxiously waiting to see some images from the new sensor from the new kid in town, CMOSIS.
Frame lines are lit with LEDs like the Leica M9 Titanium.
+1. enuff saidI hope for an awesome camera but you'll excuse me if I hold my breath considering I don't know of any other camera maker that is using a CMOSIS branded sensor.
Cheers,
Dave
Huh? It still has a OVF and an RF does it not?
And still, no one has a clue about the "guts" of this thing - that is; the sensor - until someone (anyone) puts that thing through some rigorous tests I will reserve my judgment on the camera itself.
I hope for an awesome camera but you'll excuse me if I hold my breath considering I don't know of any other camera maker that is using a CMOSIS branded sensor.
I would think that Leica would not care if the basic design is licensed from a third party.. most likely Sony.. Rather, I suspect that they are looking for an end product that meets their specs and a manufacturer/design team that can be relied upon for the life cycle of the M10.Well, according to their brochure, and DPReview, it is some Belgium based company named CMOSIS, technically the last "indie" CMOS chip maker.
However, there is a problem here.
Leica isn't particularly ... rich, and the company that is allegedly making the sensor is ... uh ... for people who can't afford Sony's massive prices for bulk sensors ... This sensor maker, CMOSIS, is kind of ... budget minded. They have been around only since late 2007, early 2008. So I doubt they were able to build a CMOS 24mp sensor from ground up ... not with those resources ... and it doesn’t have stupidly high ISO that is usable either.
So more than likely, it is a licensed Sony (or other big sensor maker) design (since there has only be a couple of Full Frame 24 megapixel CMOS sensors released in the last 5 years), with modifications made by the Belgium-based company, and some fab in Taiwan is making the actual chip.
It is an unknown sensor, and more than likely, it has an AA filter (to make the video usable).
6400 ISO, that's pretty hilarious. Haha. Splash proof is good though. Although that means eff all, define "splash"? Better than nothing perhaps.
Anyone know what this flat sensor technology is about? From a marketing standpoint, it makes the M10 peripheral sensor sound more film like. A Biogon friendly M10 would be nice.
Must not be a huge hit in usability. Nikon didn't remove video from the D800E did they?
Much as many predicted. I'm lgad they didn't call it the M10. It's a fantastic development which is good for all current owners I suspect. Those second hand R lenses just jumped in price. I suspect it will cost over $10k which leaves me content with my M9-P - for the moment.
I am sure that the new "M" will sell small numbers to the wealthy but Leica has sealed its fate to be an increasingly niche manufacturer. The M and ME simply are not competitive by any measure you wish to use. I was shocked by the lack of imagination shown to us today by Leica management.
Its too bad. I am a Leica fan but its competition in the mirrorless category is now very good with better specifications and much lower prices. I just can't justify buying anything in its current lineup. I think this is a sad day for Leica fans like me.
$5450 US is still a lot of money.. about the same as a used M9 P today.
Well, given the choice of $5500 for a new M9 EQUIVALENT (M-E) or a used M9 for $4900, I'd rather buy new. unless the M9 was down to 4K or less, there's no reason not to buy the M-E.