Minolta 40mm M-Rokkor, which version?

S

Satisfied Fool

Established
Local time
7:31 PM
Joined
Dec 23, 2015
Messages
52
I am looking to get a 40mm m-rokkor and I read something about there being two versions. The later version would have a different coating and is better according to the internet. I haven't been able to find anything on how to tell these two versions apart though? Who can enlighten me...
 
the later multi coated version for the CLE has the serial number on the lens barrel, not on the front 'name ring' as the earlier version
 
I've owned them all and currently own a CLE version. Condition is probably the most important factor. Yes, the CLE has more modern coatings. That's not what everyone wants though (single coating has it's virtues). It's a fantastic lens and imo very undervalued. Best! :)
 
The CLE version (which I have) is better built. It has a straight RF cam, which creates less problems when using it on multiple cameras. Really great lens.
 
f16sunshine said:
I've owned them all and currently own a CLE version. That's not what everyone wants though (single coating has it's virtues). It's a fantastic lens and imo very undervalued. Best! :)
Click to expand...
Yep I have the single coated version which I like better for the vintage look I get with B&W. Actually the color from that lens is pretty sweet also.
 
I just picked up the CLE (2nd) version. The build quality is nice, not quite up to the contemporary Leica standards (my 35/2.8 Summaron is the best built lens I've ever handled). My copy exhibits a bit of focus ring wobble which I think is a common issue with these as they age (helicoid packing grease). I'll probably send it to DAG for a tune-up.

The rendering is really nice, particularly the out of focus areas at wide apertures.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom