jimbobuk
Established
I just won a rokkor on ebay the other day.. yet to arrive, hopefully tomorrow.
Here's the auction..
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7599842121&rd=1&sspagename=STRK:MEWN:IT&rd=1
Looks a good one hopefully.. though missing caps, hood, and i may add a filter (i'll have to dig up the filter size, 40.5mm i think).
Anyways was just wondering about it with my R-D1.. being bayonet fit it will fit directly onto my R-D1 wont it, no adapter required?
Being a 40mm lens, and the fact that i wear glasses, i'm wondering which frameline will work best.. will the 50mm lines be almost exactly correct for the 40mm view? seeing as the lines are typically generous when working with the lens they're set at...
I've found some discussion about the R-D1 and rokkor here
http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/2/117163.html?1110551609
Whats your view on the lens now after all this time LCT?
Cheers
Here's the auction..
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7599842121&rd=1&sspagename=STRK:MEWN:IT&rd=1
Looks a good one hopefully.. though missing caps, hood, and i may add a filter (i'll have to dig up the filter size, 40.5mm i think).
Anyways was just wondering about it with my R-D1.. being bayonet fit it will fit directly onto my R-D1 wont it, no adapter required?
Being a 40mm lens, and the fact that i wear glasses, i'm wondering which frameline will work best.. will the 50mm lines be almost exactly correct for the 40mm view? seeing as the lines are typically generous when working with the lens they're set at...
I've found some discussion about the R-D1 and rokkor here
http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/2/117163.html?1110551609
Whats your view on the lens now after all this time LCT?
Cheers
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
Yes, it will fit directly on your R-D 1 without any kind of adapter, and it should work fine and perform well.
Based on my experience using the C-V 40/1.4 on an R-D 1, I'd suggest you use the 35mm framelines as long as your subjects are farther away than about 10 feet. The 35mm framelines are a very close match for a 40mm lens at longer distances.
At distances closer than roughly 10 feet, the 35mm frames will start showing more than will appear on your final image (because the lens increases its effective focal length as you focus closer.) This could result in objects being cropped out that you expected to be included. At close distances, you may want to switch to 50mm; you'll get quite a bit more on the image than you saw through the finder, but at least you'll be able to be sure that everything you saw within the finder lines will show up on the picture.
Based on my experience using the C-V 40/1.4 on an R-D 1, I'd suggest you use the 35mm framelines as long as your subjects are farther away than about 10 feet. The 35mm framelines are a very close match for a 40mm lens at longer distances.
At distances closer than roughly 10 feet, the 35mm frames will start showing more than will appear on your final image (because the lens increases its effective focal length as you focus closer.) This could result in objects being cropped out that you expected to be included. At close distances, you may want to switch to 50mm; you'll get quite a bit more on the image than you saw through the finder, but at least you'll be able to be sure that everything you saw within the finder lines will show up on the picture.
Parx
Newbie
jimbobuk said:Anyways was just wondering about it with my R-D1.. being bayonet fit it will fit directly onto my R-D1 wont it, no adapter required?
Being a 40mm lens, and the fact that i wear glasses, i'm wondering which frameline will work best.. will the 50mm lines be almost exactly correct for the 40mm view? seeing as the lines are typically generous when working with the lens they're set at...
I like this lens very much on my R-D1. Yes, it fits right on without an adapter. I use the 35 mm lines and they seem to be close enough.
Attached are three shots taken with this lens on the R-D1, straight from the Epson raw converter. No changes made, other than white balance and resizing. Notice a small amount of vignetting, certainly nothing objectionable.
Attachments
jimbobuk
Established
Thanks for the replies guys good to know... especially on possibly switching framelines depending on if you're shooting near or far.. hopefully with glasses the 35mm may just relate nicely to whats visible throughout the range.
Hope its a nice performer and small to boot.. wont hurt the R-D1 at all..
Hope its a nice performer and small to boot.. wont hurt the R-D1 at all..
LCT
ex-newbie
jimbobuk said:...Whats your view on the lens now after all this time LCT?
Still the same but i've got some front focus issues at short to medium distance from time to time, i don't know why.
Otherwise the more noticeable difference with the Summicron-C 40/2 is the little rubber hood of the later that doesn't fit on the Rokkor unfortunately.
BTW i mainly use the 35mm framelines as well.
Best,
LCT
R
RML
Guest
The M-Rokkor will fit on the R-D1.
Best framelines are the 35mm lines. A perfect match.
I shoot an awful lot with this combo. See _my photo portfolio_ for many examples.
Best framelines are the 35mm lines. A perfect match.
I shoot an awful lot with this combo. See _my photo portfolio_ for many examples.
jimbobuk
Established
nice pictures RML, there are a few broken links on that first page (a lot of the night time times square shots).. I'll look through more later.. received the lens now.. seems in great condition with nothing obvious to see on it.. seems to be sharp and focused where my rangefinder is telling me it is. Will be looking now on my PC to have more of an idea.
Cheers
Cheers
jimbobuk
Established
i'm on the look out for a rear cap for the lens.. could someone clear up what i'm looking for.. what are the two names for the two types of lecia fit.. screw in, and what this rokkor is.. Is the rokkor lens an M mount lens? Is LTM mount for the old style screw-in leica lens. So am i looking for an LTM rear cap, an M rear cap, or something different? Cheers
R
RML
Guest
jimbobuk said:nice pictures RML, there are a few broken links on that first page (a lot of the night time times square shots).. I'll look through more later.. received the lens now.. seems in great condition with nothing obvious to see on it.. seems to be sharp and focused where my rangefinder is telling me it is. Will be looking now on my PC to have more of an idea.
Cheers
Thanks for pointing out those broken links! Got them fixed.
R
RML
Guest
The M-Rokkor, as the name implies, is an M mount lens. On eBay you can buy M mount rear caps per piece or even per 5 or 10. They don't cost much. I bought a cheap set of 10 rear caps + camera body caps about a year ago and whenever I have a new lens I at least have a rear cap available in the drawer. The set must have been very cheap or else I wouldn't have bought it.
jimbobuk
Established
Thanks RML i'll look through the rest of your pics when i can..
Thanks for clearing up my lens mount doh-ness.. I managed to find this page too
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/Lens-LSM.html
which set me straight finally
Thanks for clearing up my lens mount doh-ness.. I managed to find this page too
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/Lens-LSM.html
which set me straight finally
Share: