jhthomasii
Established
so, i have been shooting rangefinders for a few months now and i find it much easier than anything else. i have a canonet ql17, xa and an oly 35 rd. a couple of weeks ago, i was at a shop and got my hands on an m3. needless to say, i was done for after that. i have since decided to get a Leica but im just not sure which one.
i live in austin and there arent any at the local shop and i dont know anyone i could borrow one from so i cant try out any other models. im pretty sure i want to shoot a 35mm lens (probably the 35/1.4 voigtlander from CQ) and dont want to have to use an external VF. does that rule out the m3 or can it be used without the framelines?
are the advantages of the m6 over the m2/m4 worth the extra money? the meter would be nice but i can get by without it. i like the simplicity of the m2 but the m4's easier loading and rewind lever seem like they would be worth the slightly higher cost.
im sure im missing a lot of stuff here. any advice would be much appreciated.
i live in austin and there arent any at the local shop and i dont know anyone i could borrow one from so i cant try out any other models. im pretty sure i want to shoot a 35mm lens (probably the 35/1.4 voigtlander from CQ) and dont want to have to use an external VF. does that rule out the m3 or can it be used without the framelines?
are the advantages of the m6 over the m2/m4 worth the extra money? the meter would be nice but i can get by without it. i like the simplicity of the m2 but the m4's easier loading and rewind lever seem like they would be worth the slightly higher cost.
im sure im missing a lot of stuff here. any advice would be much appreciated.