My R2a experince (lurkers, look in)

froyd

Veteran
Local time
9:40 AM
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
2,324
This is for all of you who are reading this forum trying to decide whether to take a bold step into the RF world. I hope my experience will be of help in your research.

I have been an SLR user for over 15 years, with my main body being the Nikon F4s. Over the years the weight of that wonderful “beast” started getting to me. I moved from fast zooms to small primes, preferring ultra-wides over teles. My most shot lenses until recently were the 50mm and 20mm Nikors. Still, the weight was too much and often the camera I so loved to use sat at home because I considered it too bulky and cumbersome to take with me everywhere I went.

After lurking on RF Forum for months, reading every single page on the CameraQuest site, handling a few cameras at BH, and other types of research, I settled for a Bessa R2a.
The body having blown my limited budget on the camera body, I spent a few $ on an Industar 61 L/D and LTM>M adapter, and went on a week-long trip to Italy, armed only with the new camera.

First of all, rest assured that the R2a is a quality camera. I never touched a Leica, so I cannot make that comparison, but it felt more solid and heavy than I expected. The pebbled black finish looks very similar to that of the F4s’ motor drive and seems like it will be very resistant to scratches. The rubber patches are not as nice as I had hoped, but allow for a steady grip, if not for a luxurious feel. Even coming from a marvelously engineered camera like the F4s, I felt the R2a was a serious photographic tool.

I barely had time to glance at the instruction booklet before leaving, and I did not regret leaving it behind on my trip. If you ever used a pre-1980 SLR you’ll be right at home. Focusing is natural, exposures are quickly dialed, and the meter is pretty intuitive.

In use, I encountered the following difficulties coming from the SLR world. Focusing took longer than I had hoped, often having to focus past prime focus, and having to backtrack. This got better as I got more practice with the RF patch, but I missed many a picture because I was too slow to focus, and I even missed the antiquated auto-focus of the F4, or the split focusing patches of manual-focus SLRs. I also encountered occasional problems with the visibility of the RF patch and exposure readings, and I missed not being able to see the aperture reading in the view finder.

Additionally, I had some issued with focus at infinity and lens scale alignement, as outlined in a previous thread. Despite all this, the first pictures I developed looked properly focused and exposed.

The experience of carrying the Bessa with me was, nevertheless, everything I hoped it would be. While not light, I was able to carry the camera + I61 for hours on end without tiring, always having it with me whenever a photo op presented itself. Even better, I was able –as I had hoped—to let go of the obsessive control over every single aspect of a photograph that shooting with the F4 encouraged. By the 5th day of my trip, I was mostly shooting on manual exposure, not caring too much about exact framing, and letting DOF compensate for when I could not get the RF patches to align fast enough. While I normally enjoy sweating the details, it was fun to let go a bit, something I found shooting with a RF camera encouraged me to do.

I’m glad I chose an AE camera because taking pictures of my toddler can be challenging enough, without having to constantly re-adjust exposures as he runs in and out of the shadows. However, considering that I am the type that takes multiple spot metering of a scene, I feel pretty proud of myself for relaxing a bit and just dialing in a new exposure whenever I arrived in a new setting, and then letting that reading stand until light conditions changed enough to warrant it.

Overall the experience has been worth it. For an outlay of $550 or so I have been able to experience a different way of taking photographs, and my wife had the pleasure of going on vacation without constantly hearing me complain about the weight of the camera gear hanging on my neck!

If you can swing it financially, I encourage you to take the leap and give the camera a chance to grow on you, or better, for your way of taking photographs to evolve. If funds are an issue, you might want to try a Yashica fixed lens RF, which would have been my second choice, would the Bessa have been out of reach.

I’ll be happy to answer any questions you might have, and in a few days I’ll be able to post a few sample pictures.
 
Good post, Froyd. A lot of us came to RF cameras for the same reason ... a quest for simplicity and high quality in a small package.
 
...Here we go, FINALLY!

...Here we go, FINALLY!

For those curious about how my R2a and I61 experience turned out, here are some pictures from the very first rolls. Then I was still trying to come to grips with the RF patch and the metering system. I'm blown away by the way my $25 Industar reproduces colors, and by its sharpness. My Nikor 50mm SLR lens is a tad better, but it can also be harsher and cost multiples of what I spent on this little FSU gem.

A little postscript on how I got my hads on the Bessa. One day I receive a call from my previous employer saying that they discovered that they owed me "two ninety nine" for some expenses I had incurred months earlier. I had been looking at a Bessa for a while but was waiting for Christmass or my birthday to get it. However, when I heard that I had that check coming to me I told my wife who agreed to "match" the funds as part of our wedding anniversary, which was days away, so I could get my R2a (and finally SHUT UP ABOUT IT😀) ... All I can say is, good thing that she pushed me to get the camera before receiving the check from my old company, because when it finally arrived it was for $2.99, not $299 as was sure I had heard! 😛

That woman is a saint, I tell you!
 

Attachments

  • 011_8.JPG
    011_8.JPG
    527.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 012_10A.JPG
    012_10A.JPG
    409.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 006_3.JPG
    006_3.JPG
    444.8 KB · Views: 0
Froyd, those are some luscious photographs! You've motivated me to try out the 61 L/D I've been neglecting. (I have been using my Jupiter 8, another inexpensive Soviet lens, with very nice results.)
Thank you for the comments on the R2A. I also gave some serious thought to getting one before a big trip, though in the end I decided to put the money into having my old Leica-Minolta CL repaired and it too turned out to be a wonderful, easily carried companion.
Is that your wife in the third picture? If so, she is one of the prettiest saints in the pantheon!
Welcome to the rangefinder crowd!
-- Michael
 
nice pics Froyd, and a nice camera, great story...2.99, my wife would have killed me 😉

Todd
 
Hello Froyd...a few days ago I posted a thread: "SLR to Bessa...maybe", and got some terrific answers, and now I'm adding your experience to the mix. Funny, though, it's sounding like we're both going through some sort of 12-step program for SLR-aholics.
 
Ah well shot my second roll of film with my new Bessa r2a.
Decided to shoot a roll of colour neg so I can pop it off at the local lab and check that the camera is indeed working.

So shot a roll of around Edinburgh while I was over to see the Robert Mapplethorpe and Harry Benson exhibitions.

Starting to get a better feel for the camera, though I still find the framelines a bit vague at times. But I'm getting used to the AE lock, though my finger still hunts for the shutter button.

Biggest disappointment though is the shutter. It's very noisy. I lined up an old chap who was sitting on a bench reading the paper. I preset the focus and exposure and decided to take a walk by snap with the camera just hanging round my neck. I walked up to him and pressed the shutter, and he looked straight up at me from his paper. Darn. This camera is far from silent and probably makes more noise than my EOS 30 and 5D.

But it is small, light, easy to walk about with and generally doesn't seem to get too much attention.

The exhibitions were excellent by the way.
 
Nice review Froyd. The CV cameras are quality cameras and serve their purpose well.

The shutter noise is about as loud as my FM3a, which is to say, not stealthy, but also not earth-shatteringly loud. Not for use in a hushed theater, but fine for street work.
 
Flyfisher Tom said:
Nice review Froyd. The CV cameras are quality cameras and serve their purpose well.

The shutter noise is about as loud as my FM3a, which is to say, not stealthy, but also not earth-shatteringly loud. Not for use in a hushed theater, but fine for street work.

Indeed. One thing I'd hoped to be able to use my new rangefinder for was for shooting roundabout film crews. As a member of a film making collective I'm often trying to take puctures when the camera is rolling, but if it's indoors often the sound man will give me that dirty look to tell me to stop.

But I've still got the Canonet, which is almost silent. A real shame the Bessa is so noisey.
 
I've uploaded 4 shots from the first roll through my new Bessa. Well actually it's the second roll, but it's the first to be processed.

Umm the gallery software has resized em, so they ain't quite as sharp as I would like.
I assume there is a max size to upload to avoid auto re-size and compression.

Anyway the pictures are nothing to get excited about, just shot to try and get familar with the camera and to check it works.

I'm not gonna judge a lens on one roll, but so far so good. I feel optimistic about the ultron. And what a joy to shoot a roll of colour film after a year shooting colour mostly on digital. Wow! I thought I was going to only shoot b&w on film, but now I might do some colour too.

Oh the roll was Superia 200asa colour neg.
 
Back
Top Bottom