uhligfd
Well-known
ok, I am not a salon shooter, I do not pound much of the pavement. I do - however - take my cameras out into the woods and fields all the time.
So, over time i have lost all sort of covers to lenses for all sort of cameras in those woods.
Most recently a nice metal cover for the GG-3 hood of the 90mm lens just was not there when I checked. Retracing my steps through the brush led me astray and I never recovered the metal cover.
So I got a generic 57 mm snap on cover, which incidentally always catches inside the bag so it usually comes off automatically when I pull out the camera with lens.
Then I tried a 55mm screw in cover just like the ones all modern SLR lenses come with. It has held, does hold, and I am happy to not use the lost nice city-slick metal Contax cover any longer. Good riddance.
What are your experiences with covers over the hoods? Contax surely had a design problem with them ...
And of course I do not use a hood on the 28mm lens; it is just too short to do anything ...
So, over time i have lost all sort of covers to lenses for all sort of cameras in those woods.
Most recently a nice metal cover for the GG-3 hood of the 90mm lens just was not there when I checked. Retracing my steps through the brush led me astray and I never recovered the metal cover.
So I got a generic 57 mm snap on cover, which incidentally always catches inside the bag so it usually comes off automatically when I pull out the camera with lens.
Then I tried a 55mm screw in cover just like the ones all modern SLR lenses come with. It has held, does hold, and I am happy to not use the lost nice city-slick metal Contax cover any longer. Good riddance.
What are your experiences with covers over the hoods? Contax surely had a design problem with them ...
And of course I do not use a hood on the 28mm lens; it is just too short to do anything ...