Harry Lime
Practitioner
I wonder how the TMY-2 400 will fare with a more dilute or compensating developer. I always found that HC 110 had a tendency to go too high contrast, and that coupled with the inherent contrast of the Tmax film can be problematic.
I shot about 10 rolls of the stuff and developed it in Barry Thornton's 2-Bath developer. The lighting in these shots varied from flat overcast to harsh sunlight.
Overall I'm very impressed.
Grain is much tighter than Tri-X in the same soup and format. It almost feels like you are shooting a grainy 100asa film.
The response curve appears to be more linear than Tri-X, which is very nice if you like the low contrast look. Shoot it with a single coated lens like an early Nikkor H-C 2/50 and you're looking at a HCB tonal scale. Overall I think the tonality is better than the original TMY 400.
The 2-bath developer prevents TMY-2 400 from blowing out in the highlights. Even shooting directly in to the sun is manageable. But I fear that you would get blown highlights in a single bath developer. I have a sneaking suspicion that Tri-X has more latitude.
It scans very nicely.