bugmenot
Well-known
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/0...with-39-point-af-and-uncompressed-1080p-video
Guess the sub-$2000 price was a rumour after all ...
Guess the sub-$2000 price was a rumour after all ...
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
About the same price as the newly announced Sony A99. They share a similar, if not the same, sensor.
bugmenot
Well-known
About the same price as the newly announced Sony A99. They share a similar, if not the same, sensor.
About $700 cheaper, but still. I can't see the appeal of this, let's be honest, half-assed full frame camera. It is designed SPECIFICALLY to NOT undercut the D800 ... And every little thing was picked at to reduce price apparently. Still, it presents a clear upgrade path for D90/D7000/D300/D300S users ... if they so choose to take on the Full Frame promise.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
About $700 cheaper, but still. I can't see the appeal of this, let's be honest, half-assed full frame camera. It is designed SPECIFICALLY to NOT undercut the D800 ... And every little thing was picked at to reduce price apparently. Still, it presents a clear upgrade path for D90/D7000/D300/D300S users ... if they so choose to take on the Full Frame promise.
Why is this a 'half arsed full frame camera' ... but not so the RX1 which lacks a viewfinder?
Please explain!
bugmenot
Well-known
Why is this a 'half arsed full frame camera' ... but not so the RX1 which lacks a viewfinder?
Please explain!![]()
RX1 is a point and shoot. It is obvious Sony does not intend for the RX1 to sell to a large audience. It is a niche camera, more so because of the fixed lens with its fixed focal length.
D600 is a Nikon DSLR. It is expected to be used everywhere. I only say half-assed with respect to Nikon products, where each is specifically reduced in certain features, materials, alloys, plastics, etc. to cut costs and not undercut the higher end model. And to quote TheVerge, "it's a little too pricey to truly be bringing full-frame photography within reach of the masses".
alphonse2501
Established
M4/3 welcomes you, or search used D700 / 5D.
Otherwise, film still exist...
Otherwise, film still exist...
Lss
Well-known
The European price (2400 € according to Engadget) is not even sub-$3000.http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/0...with-39-point-af-and-uncompressed-1080p-video
Guess the sub-$2000 price was a rumour after all ...
jarski
Veteran
Nice its official now, despite current price. Full frame in smaller package. Bet Canon has something similar in their roadmaps too. My AI lenses that have been sitting in storage box for years will again start seeing something
Hope focus screens for manual lenses soon appear too.
jonasv
has no mustache
The European price (2400 € according to Engadget) is not even sub-$3000.
A D800 is only € 2699 over here?
Lss
Well-known
And it seems to be € 2599 here. The street price is always lower, but it must be a lot lower in this case. Or Engadget has the price wrong.A D800 is only € 2699 over here?
Here's the link: http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/13/nikon-d600-full-frame-dslr/
daveleo
what?
I was mildly interested at the rumored $1500 price (I have Nikon lenses and a D5100 and would like to stay Nikon), but at $2100 ? . . . no . . . I'm out.
If Nikon doesn't announce a 20mm or 24mm/f2.0 or 2.8 DX prime lens at Photokina, I am selling off and going over to Fuji X100 (or XE1 ?).
If Nikon doesn't announce a 20mm or 24mm/f2.0 or 2.8 DX prime lens at Photokina, I am selling off and going over to Fuji X100 (or XE1 ?).
Pirate
Guitar playing Fotografer
And no PC sync port, just like the D7000.
kshapero
South Florida Man
The D7000 is half the price. Only advantage of D600 is FX. Is it worth it?
About $700 cheaper, but still. I can't see the appeal of this, let's be honest, half-assed full frame camera. It is designed SPECIFICALLY to NOT undercut the D800 ...
And you think that wasn't a smart idea by Nikon?
fstops
-
The difference between $2100 and $1500 is a Sony EVF...
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Digital Camera Warehouse in Brisbane have just listed the D600 for $2470.00 ... that's more than I paid for my D700 new a couple of years ago!
Archlich
Well-known
The D7000 is half the price. Only advantage of D600 is FX. Is it worth it?
Surely will go for the Leica X2 instead of the RX1, with lower price tag and the benefit of the red dot
Spleenrippa
Yes, Right There
I'm betting that after a few months, once the hype dies down and demand from the early-adopters eases off a tad we'll see the price of a D600 body drop down to the $15-1800 range.
I had the cash a couple months ago and decided to go with a D2X (my brother swears by his) to supplement my F5... Fx senor or not, $2000 for the D7k body is silly. If I were going to buy now, I'd save the extra $1000 and get the far superior D800.
I had the cash a couple months ago and decided to go with a D2X (my brother swears by his) to supplement my F5... Fx senor or not, $2000 for the D7k body is silly. If I were going to buy now, I'd save the extra $1000 and get the far superior D800.
photo_fred
photo_fred
happy I didn't wait for this camera instead of buying my D800.I feel the D800 was well worth what I paid for it.
Mcary
Well-known
The D7000 is half the price. Only advantage of D600 is FX. Is it worth it?
For some FX (36x24mm) is the Holy Grail of photography for others its just another format. Larger then Micro 4/3rds and DX but smaller then 56 x 41.5mm(digital MF) 6x6/7/8 MF 8x10 large format. Each of which have their own particular pluses and minus.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.