jsrockit
Moderator
😱😱😱😱 Thats crazy!! how many rolls of film have you run through that thing??
Maybe the better question is how much did you play with it while sitting on the couch at home? 😀
😱😱😱😱 Thats crazy!! how many rolls of film have you run through that thing??
Maybe the better question is how much did you play with it while sitting on the couch at home? 😀
😱😱😱😱 Thats crazy!! how many rolls of film have you run through that thing??
Over the past two months about a hundred. Some of that was 220 also. Anyway who's counting? I just try to shoot as much film as possible. Hopefully I get a few great pictures.
That's not unreasonable at all. 1000+ images? I'm sure I did a lot more in digital within that same timeframe... I better be quiet before the stat police come after me and my digital ways.
I really liked the feel and balance of your M9, the only thing I need is a grip. LOL.
Boo on the grip! I got my replacement M8 yesterday and it's a lot nicer. Will be using it on Sunday.
Boo on the grip! I got my replacement M8 yesterday and it's a lot nicer. Will be using it on Sunday.
Hmm looks like i'll be the only person shooting a big camera. Maybe I should bring my M4 too :bang:
John's got an M8 now....?????? Whats going on..
I will try to make it.
Steve, how do you like Koni omega so far?
I had a Koni-Omega in the early '70's which was stolen. Later I picked up a couple of others in the late '80's and used them again. I always liked them because of the negative size, quality of the lenses, and affordability. The negatives produced great 16"x20" prints, and smaller, of course. The reason I first got one was because I was not pleased with the 16" x 20" and 20x24 print resolution from 35mm negs.
When scanned, the files come out at about 60megs. That's not bad for less than a $150. I have an 18"x24" iris print of the California Cost, north of Bodega Bay, that I shot in the '90's
Attached are a couple of test shots from my first roll on the latest one.
John will have been inspired by Cal shooting over 20,000 feet of film recently and wind up with an M3 and 50mm.
If I was going to use film seriously, it would be a M6 TTL or MP. It's not happening though.
I think you'd agree that digital suits my style of photography Cal.
The question that needs to be answered is "are you crazy like me?"
Well, my crazyness is more in my attitude... I feel my work is very subtle.