Opinion on W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5

[splitimageview]

Some really good photos here, although something tells me any camera or lens would shine in the hands of underlord.

I have a very early 35/3.5 Nippon Kogaku Tokyo in Leica thread, MIOJ, I don't think it performs to the level of the later Nikon RF lenses.

 

[farlymac]

Some shots I did with the 3.5/3.5 in S mount for your comparison, nomadia.

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=156796

PF

 

[nomadia]

Opinion on W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5

Some shots I did with the 3.5/3.5 in S mount for your comparison, nomadia.

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=156796

PF

Thanks farlymac.

Here's some photos I took around Old San Juan, Puerto Rico yesterday, shot with expired HP5 and souped in HC110.

 

[briansilcox]

If you want to see what that lens can do, get some better film, and even better yet, some slower film so that the grain does not mask the lens performance.

 

[Corran]

Fast film is fine but the scanning looks like it was done with an office scanner and a white piece of paper or something.

Here's the (LTM, on a Leica III) 3.5cm f/3.5 with Tri-X, dev'd in SPUR HRX:

I do really like this lens but it is definitely less than optimal in the corners resolution-wise, compared to newer/better lenses, if that matters.

 

[nomadia]

Opinion on W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5

If you want to see what that lens can do, get some better film, and even better yet, some slower film so that the grain does not mask the lens performance.

Thanks for the suggestion and criticism!

Here's some from FP4 and at the same location.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[farlymac]

Much better. One of my favorite films since Kodak killed off Plus-X.

PF

 

[richardHaw]

I am liking mine. It is a sharp little lens

 

[richardHaw]

I just overhauled this little thing and I will publish it in my richardhaw.com blog in the coming weeks (tomorrow is an F-mount lens).

I love this lens a lot. I bought it for the historical value and since I shoot at f/8 most of the time, the f/3.5 doesn't matter at all to me.

 

[nomadia]

Opinion on W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5

I just overhauled this little thing and I will publish it in my richardhaw.com blog in the coming weeks (tomorrow is an F-mount lens).



I love this lens a lot. I bought it for the historical value and since I shoot at f/8 most of the time, the f/3.5 doesn't matter at all to me.

Thanks! That will be very useful. Is a 35mm Nikkor F1.4 AI or AIS also in your future blog plans?

 

[richardHaw]

Thanks! That will be very useful. Is a 35mm Nikkor F1.4 AI or AIS also in your future blog plans?

I have a 35/1.4 Ai-S but it's not a junk - so, no

what happened to your 35/1.4? haven't opened one yet but I assume that it's not so difficult since there are no gimmicks involved. I must say, S-mount and Leica lenses are even more of a pain because of the special tools needed:bang:

 

[nomadia]

I have a 35/1.4 Ai-S but it's not a junk - so, no



what happened to your 35/1.4? haven't opened one yet but I assume that it's not so difficult since there are no gimmicks involved. I must say, S-mount and Leica lenses are even more of a pain because of the special tools needed:bang:

Just general cleaning. Focus seems a bit stiff.

Anyway, here's another from the W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5, Kodak Tri-X, Rodinal 1:50

 

[Dektol Dan]

Nikkor 3.5 35mm

Nikkor 3.5 35mm

I'm a fan; it has an old Zeiss look about it, a good compliment to an Elmar, but not quite the same look. Better for black and white, but here are a couple of color shots too:

 

[iphoenix]

The LTM/S-mount W-Nikkor 3.5cm F2.5 and Nikonos W-Nikkor 35mm F2.5 are the same 6 elements in 4 groups optical formula, but the E-Series Nikon 35mm F2.5 is a completely different lens (5 elements in 5 groups). It has to be to clear the mirror/meet the backfocus requirements of an F-mount body.

Just on the Nikonos lens: I've used it above the water; it is a superb lens.

I cannot comment on underwater use, as I haven't used it under these conditions.

 

[richardHaw]

Just general cleaning. Focus seems a bit stiff.

Anyway, here's another from the W-Nikkor 3.5cm F3.5, Kodak Tri-X, Rodinal 1:50

I see. I may make an overhaul article for that on my richardhaw.com blog in the future. been getting a few requests to do so.

I made a lens cap for my 3.5/.35 from a rear lens cap (contax?) that I cut down and lined with velvet. saved me a couple of $$$.

this is now my main lens.

 

[nomadia]

with Kodak Ektar 100

punta santiago by bonn aure, on Flickr

 

[richardHaw]

I just dropped mine from a little more than 1m last night because I was super tired. the solid brass on the end of the lens hit a paint tin. :bang:

Lens: 1

Paint tin: 0

 

[richardHaw]

Got another one :bang:

sold to me for 1/3 the running price because it had fungus.

this is the next version after the one I got, looks almost identical but now comes with aperture clicks and some lettering changes. it should have similar construction but there are several differences in the lens and it's a bit different internally.

https://www.facebook.com/Classic-Nikon-Maintenance-1101494459873165/

check how the fungus spores were treated. I like the fizzle effect

 

[maryland_fotos]

Here's a sample from the 3.5cm f3.5, MIOJ version mounted on S2, Pan F 50 film.

39000030 by Maryland Photos, on Flickr

 

[maryland_fotos]

One more with the same lens on the S2. Ilford FP4+ film.

39020006 by Maryland Photos, on Flickr