bugmenot
Well-known
On the contrary, if the S100, Canon G-series or Leica X1/2 are considered Point and Shoot, why not X100? Just because its auto mode isn't that great?
I wouldn't call the X100 or Rollei 35 point and shoot cameras.
I'm not saying these cameras are not P&S cameras because they are good cameras, I'm saying they are not P&S cameras because they are not P&S cameras.
Elaborate on that perhaps. They can point and shoot quite effectively. They have a fixed lens. What else doesn't qualify them for the designation?
Also, although it is a rangefinder camera, I guess XA is also considered as P&S?
Stop !!!!!!! 😱 Time to define what Point and Shoot really is. To me, adjustable focus is AKA zone focus thus not P&S. I'm thinking any auto exposure or just 1 set aperture and shutter speed, auto or fixed focus lens is the essence of "point & shoot". I even think that "flash off" control is stretching it a bit - nice to have the option.
Then again, infinity pre-set is nice, adjustable ISO . . . . . . ah, well - you know. Ultimately a pure point and shoot camera may be the kind that TIME sent to you for "free" with a paid subscription.
You CAN take control if you want to. To my mind P&S cameras are only those which give you no control and no choice.
Ronnie
Elaborate on that perhaps. They can point and shoot quite effectively. They have a fixed lens. What else doesn't qualify them for the designation?
I'm not saying these cameras are not P&S cameras because they are good cameras, I'm saying they are not P&S cameras because they are not P&S cameras.
I have a roll of Ektar 100 defrosting for the ML. It loves 100 ASA film.Thanks to greyscale for getting us back on the point and shoot train. Nice Canon you have - but they're noisy critters!