mackigator
Well-known
@Ronald: yep, that would be the thing to have.
The other thing that I think about are the future versions of this design. As the sensors handle higher ISO's better, fast lenses become less of a big deal, as is already happening in the SLR world.
The turning point for me is when I can shoot handheld at F/2 ISO 400. Mentally I compare most of my cameras to my Hexanon 50mm F2 shooting 400x, in terms of ability to see and record an exposure. So something like my CV 25mm f/4 would need a useable ISO 1600 for me to be happy. That looks doable now.
I think this camera design opens up a whole new world, especially for the slow CV glass if they master the higher ISO noise. Because no one wants to pay a lot for lenses - what we want is for our photos to look a certain way. If I can get that without lenses that cost a fortune, I'm in. Where do I sign?
The other thing that I think about are the future versions of this design. As the sensors handle higher ISO's better, fast lenses become less of a big deal, as is already happening in the SLR world.
The turning point for me is when I can shoot handheld at F/2 ISO 400. Mentally I compare most of my cameras to my Hexanon 50mm F2 shooting 400x, in terms of ability to see and record an exposure. So something like my CV 25mm f/4 would need a useable ISO 1600 for me to be happy. That looks doable now.
I think this camera design opens up a whole new world, especially for the slow CV glass if they master the higher ISO noise. Because no one wants to pay a lot for lenses - what we want is for our photos to look a certain way. If I can get that without lenses that cost a fortune, I'm in. Where do I sign?
Last edited: