clcolucci58
Established
Was with the wife the other day at a garage sale and instead of finding somenold LP's I found four boxes of 35mm Panatomic-X film dated 8/82. So of course I buy it for $10.00. I used this film back in the day. Want to shoot some of this and develop it in either Rodinal or D76. Not sure about the time or maybe stand developing? As always thanks for any advice and comments.
Regards
Chris
Regards
Chris
Nokton48
Veteran
I would use D-76 myself. I traded somebody here a couple of years ago and got 100' of 1982 Pan-X. Also one of my favorite films of the seventies. Most likely yours is fine, it usually is. Slow films tolerate age better than faster ones. Use it sparingly. 
Bill Clark
Veteran
I used Panatomix X a long time ago. This article could help you:
http://jbhildebrand.com/2011/tutorials/workflow-tutorial-2-stand-development-with-rodinal/
http://jbhildebrand.com/2011/tutorials/workflow-tutorial-2-stand-development-with-rodinal/
pixelated
Established
My old Darkroom Data Guide shows 9 minutes for D-76 1:1 @ 68
(7 minutes for HC110 Dilution B)
FWIW, HC-110 is nice for old film, as it has slightly lower base fog than D-76 or (probably) Rodinal
(7 minutes for HC110 Dilution B)
FWIW, HC-110 is nice for old film, as it has slightly lower base fog than D-76 or (probably) Rodinal
leicapixie
Well-known
I would suggest D-76 rather than Rodinal, which has a base fog.
It might get real bad with old film.
Using HC-110, am amazed at the clean negatives.
Suggest exposing a few frames and cutting it out of camera.
Not possible with Leica.
See how it develops and scans or prints.
It might get real bad with old film.
Using HC-110, am amazed at the clean negatives.
Suggest exposing a few frames and cutting it out of camera.
Not possible with Leica.
See how it develops and scans or prints.
Sid836
Well-known
Definitely D-76. It will come out wonderfully. I have tried a roll of Panatomic-X in 135 format with D-76 1+1 and had great results with minimal fog. I had it presoaked for 5 minutes though.