Joao
Negativistic forever
Three more Boxing snapshots (from a spectator seat). Portra 800 and Eastman XX at ISO650
Boxing by João Avelar, on Flickr
Boxing by João Avelar, on Flickr
BOXING020 by João Avelar, on Flickr
There are some more images from this session at my Flckr album “Boxing"
Boxing



There are some more images from this session at my Flckr album “Boxing"
Boxing
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
Shab
Veteran
Love this one! Thanks for sharing! Can you say which film and lens did you use on this picture?
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
This was on Fuji Reala and I would have captured it with a Leica MP and a 35 Summicron v.2.Love this one! Thanks for sharing! Can you say which film and lens did you use on this picture?
Erik van Straten
Veteran
raphaellehnen
Established
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
Freakscene
Obscure member
I like the way you got great photos at each end of the same block. Very cool.
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
Haha yes just turned and walked a bit. Like a “shot at every corner” challenge…I like the way you got great photos at each end of the same block. Very cool.
dab
Electromagnetic waves sensor
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
Freakscene
Obscure member
Wow, what did you do to Plus-X to make it look like that?
yossi
Well-known
Back alley Barber Shop. @Little India, SG.
Ricoh GR-1, kodak double-x in HC-110.

Ricoh GR-1, kodak double-x in HC-110.
Tuna
Fotoğrafçı
Good or bad? This is from my self processing days so I could have been wonky in my agitation to create additional grain. Also, my Nikon Coolscan has always added a degree of “extra grain” to my eye. On the other hand, I’ve been partial to extra grain in shots like this one…Wow, what did you do to Plus-X to make it look like that?
Last edited:
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
chuckroast
Well-known
Back alley Barber Shop. @Little India, SG.
Ricoh GR-1, kodak double-x in HC-110.
I've walked those very streets. I can still smell the curry
As an aside, within the past month, I just did a side by side comparison of Double-X in various dilutions/times of Pyrocat-HD (all semistand or EMA), with conventional development in HC-110B, D-76 1:1, and D-23 1+3 semistand for 30min. From best to worst (grain and tonal smoothness) they scored like this:
D-76 1:1
D-23 semistand
HC-110B
Pyrocat-HD Semistand/EMA
No matter what I did with Pyrocat, the Double-X negatives turned out to have a gritty look and showed a lot of grain.
I have yet to try Double-X in conventional Pyrocat-HD agitation at 1:1:100.
I'm also doing some testing with Tri-X to see which particular developer/agitation scheme works best there as well.
woody g
Newbie
I forgot how difficult film was. Here are a few attempts, the first with a Yashica J (jpg scan of the negative) and the second with an Electro 35 GSN (tiff scan of the negative). Film was Ilford Delta 100, processed locally. I rescanned the negatives (still learning on that) and substantially cropped the hummingbird image.
I will say despite using a handheld meter, shots generally are overexposed, the J scan excepted. I have a long way to go.
I will say despite using a handheld meter, shots generally are overexposed, the J scan excepted. I have a long way to go.
Attachments
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.